@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop vs. @dnd-kit/core
Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 14 criteria
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.5M
- Stars
- 12.8K
- Gzip Size
- 51 B
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Last Updated
- 7mo ago
- Open Issues
- 103
- Forks
- 329
- Unpacked Size
- 486.5 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 26.7M
- Stars
- 17.7K
- Gzip Size
- 18.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 131
- Forks
- 921
- Unpacked Size
- 1.1 MB
- Dependencies
- 5
@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop vs @dnd-kit/core downloads · last 12 months
Criteria · @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop vs @dnd-kit/core
- API Design
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropLower-level primitives that offer fine-grained control.@dnd-kit/core ✓Higher-level abstractions simplifying common drag-and-drop patterns.
- Core Philosophy
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop ✓Provides a framework-agnostic drag-and-drop engine for broad integration.@dnd-kit/coreA lightweight, React-centric library for performant drag-and-drop.
- Bundle Footprint
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop ✓Exceptionally minimal, with an extremely small gzip bundle size.@dnd-kit/coreConsiderably larger, typical for comprehensive feature sets in React libraries.
- Primary Audience
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropTeams building cross-framework components or abstracting drag-and-drop logic.@dnd-kit/core ✓React developers seeking idiomatic and accessible drag-and-drop solutions.
- Ecosystem Support
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropFramework-agnostic, relies on adapters for specific frameworks.@dnd-kit/core ✓Strong ties to the React ecosystem, benefiting from community contributions.
- Accessibility Focus
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropCore engine provides a foundation, but accessibility features may require explicit implementation.@dnd-kit/core ✓Prioritizes built-in accessibility support out-of-the-box.
- Customization Depth
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop ✓Allows for very deep customization of behavior via core primitives.@dnd-kit/coreHighly customizable, but patterns are often guided by React principles.
- Extensibility Model
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropEmphasizes core primitives and hooks for custom logic.@dnd-kit/core ✓Offers built-in patterns and abstractions like sensors and modifiers.
- Dependency Footprint
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop ✓Minimal to zero external dependencies outside its core logic.@dnd-kit/corePrimarily a React-dependent library, with potential for minimal other runtime dependencies.
- Developer Onboarding
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropMay require a deeper understanding of underlying primitives for advanced use.@dnd-kit/core ✓Smoother for React developers due to idiomatic API and ecosystem alignment.
- Underlying Mechanism
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropFocuses on abstracting raw DOM events and interactions.@dnd-kit/core ✓Leverages React's event system and component model.
- Framework Integration
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop ✓Decoupled core logic, suitable for various JS environments.@dnd-kit/coreDeeply integrated with React's lifecycle and rendering.
- Initial Setup Complexity
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-dropPotentially higher for framework integration due to its abstract nature.@dnd-kit/core ✓Lower within React projects due to direct component integration.
- Performance Optimization Strategy
- @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop ✓Achieved through minimal footprint and efficient core logic.@dnd-kit/coreAchieved through React-specific optimizations and efficient rendering.
| Criteria | @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop | @dnd-kit/core |
|---|---|---|
| API Design | Lower-level primitives that offer fine-grained control. | ✓ Higher-level abstractions simplifying common drag-and-drop patterns. |
| Core Philosophy | ✓ Provides a framework-agnostic drag-and-drop engine for broad integration. | A lightweight, React-centric library for performant drag-and-drop. |
| Bundle Footprint | ✓ Exceptionally minimal, with an extremely small gzip bundle size. | Considerably larger, typical for comprehensive feature sets in React libraries. |
| Primary Audience | Teams building cross-framework components or abstracting drag-and-drop logic. | ✓ React developers seeking idiomatic and accessible drag-and-drop solutions. |
| Ecosystem Support | Framework-agnostic, relies on adapters for specific frameworks. | ✓ Strong ties to the React ecosystem, benefiting from community contributions. |
| Accessibility Focus | Core engine provides a foundation, but accessibility features may require explicit implementation. | ✓ Prioritizes built-in accessibility support out-of-the-box. |
| Customization Depth | ✓ Allows for very deep customization of behavior via core primitives. | Highly customizable, but patterns are often guided by React principles. |
| Extensibility Model | Emphasizes core primitives and hooks for custom logic. | ✓ Offers built-in patterns and abstractions like sensors and modifiers. |
| Dependency Footprint | ✓ Minimal to zero external dependencies outside its core logic. | Primarily a React-dependent library, with potential for minimal other runtime dependencies. |
| Developer Onboarding | May require a deeper understanding of underlying primitives for advanced use. | ✓ Smoother for React developers due to idiomatic API and ecosystem alignment. |
| Underlying Mechanism | Focuses on abstracting raw DOM events and interactions. | ✓ Leverages React's event system and component model. |
| Framework Integration | ✓ Decoupled core logic, suitable for various JS environments. | Deeply integrated with React's lifecycle and rendering. |
| Initial Setup Complexity | Potentially higher for framework integration due to its abstract nature. | ✓ Lower within React projects due to direct component integration. |
| Performance Optimization Strategy | ✓ Achieved through minimal footprint and efficient core logic. | Achieved through React-specific optimizations and efficient rendering. |
The @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop package is architected around a philosophy of providing a robust, underlying drag-and-drop engine that aims for broad applicability across various frontend frameworks and environments. Its core strength lies in its abstraction, allowing developers to integrate complex drag-and-drop interactions without being tied to a specific UI rendering paradigm. This makes it a compelling choice for teams building reusable UI components or applications that might evolve their frontend technology over time.
@dnd-kit/core, on the other hand, is specifically designed as a lightweight and performant React library. Its primary audience comprises React developers seeking a streamlined, idiomatic way to implement drag-and-drop functionality within their applications. The package prioritizes a developer-friendly API that aligns with React's component-based structure, focusing on accessibility and ease of integration within existing React projects.
A key architectural difference is their approach to framework integration. @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop offers a framework-agnostic core, meaning its fundamental logic is decoupled from any specific rendering library. This design allows it to be integrated into vanilla JavaScript, Web Components, or even other frameworks with some adapter logic. In contrast, @dnd-kit/core is deeply rooted in React, leveraging React's lifecycle and rendering mechanisms for its operations, which simplifies integration for React developers but limits its direct applicability outside the React ecosystem.
Another significant technical distinction lies in their extensibility and plugin models. @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop emphasizes a core engine with hooks and primitives that allow for custom logic and event handling, promoting a DIY approach to extending functionality. @dnd-kit/core, while also extensible, often provides more opinionated, built-in solutions for common patterns and features, including a well-defined system for modifiers and sensors that abstract away many low-level details, facilitating quicker development for standard use cases.
Regarding developer experience, @dnd-kit/core generally offers a smoother onboarding for React developers due to its idiomatic API and comprehensive documentation tailored for the React ecosystem. Its focus on common drag-and-drop patterns means many scenarios can be implemented with less boilerplate. @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop, while powerful, might present a steeper learning curve for those not accustomed to abstracting DOM manipulation and event handling, requiring a deeper understanding of its underlying primitives to leverage its full potential, especially when integrating with specific UI frameworks.
From a performance and bundle size perspective, @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop demonstrates an exceptionally lean footprint. Its gzip bundle size is remarkably small, suggesting a minimal impact on application load times. @dnd-kit/core, while also aiming for efficiency within its React context, has a considerably larger bundle size, which is typical for libraries that bundle a broader set of features and framework-specific optimizations directly. For applications where every kilobyte counts, @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop has a clear advantage.
Practically, if you are building a React application and require a performant, accessible, and feature-rich drag-and-drop solution with a good developer experience, @dnd-kit/core is likely the more straightforward choice. If your project involves multiple JavaScript frameworks, requires maximum control over DOM events, or you are prioritizing the absolute smallest possible bundle size for a drag-and-drop utility, then @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop's framework-agnostic core might be more suitable, though it may require more integration effort.
Considering long-term maintenance and ecosystem, @dnd-kit/core benefits from a large, active React community, which often translates to faster issue resolution and a wealth of community-contributed examples and extensions. @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop, stemming from Atlassian's design system, likely has strong internal backing and a commitment to its core engine's stability. However, its framework-agnostic nature means its broader adoption might depend on how effectively developers create and maintain framework-specific integration layers or adapters.
For niche use cases, @atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop's minimal size and framework independence could be advantageous in environments with strict performance requirements or custom rendering pipelines. Its core engine could also be a foundation for building highly specialized drag-and-drop tools. Conversely, @dnd-kit/core's rich set of sensors and modifiers, coupled with its accessibility focus, makes it exceptionally well-suited for complex, user-facing interfaces where custom drag interactions need to be robust and inclusive within a React application.
CORRECTIONS
Spot wrong data here?Spot wrong data on this page?
A short note helps us fix it.A short note helps us fix it. We read every one; confirmed fixes ship in the next nightly build.
Anonymous · No account · No email back