ava vs jest
Side-by-side comparison of ava and jest
- Weekly Downloads
- 580.2K
- Stars
- 20.9K
- Gzip Size
- 942 B
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3mo ago
- Open Issues
- 63
- Forks
- 1.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 289.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 38.1M
- Stars
- 45.3K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 237
- Forks
- 6.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 6.3 kB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
Ava is a streamlined test runner aimed at developers who prefer simplicity and speed in concurrent testing. It offers a lightweight solution for those focused on writing concise test suites with an emphasis on performance and minimalism.
Jest, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive testing framework that suits larger applications requiring robust features like snapshot testing and seamless integration with the React ecosystem. It is particularly well-suited for teams with varying experience levels who might benefit from its extensive built-in features and active community support.
While migrating from ava to jest or vice versa could involve adjustments in test structure and methodology, the choice ultimately depends on your project's complexity. For smaller projects, ava may keep things simple, but for more extensive applications, the breadth of features in jest may prove more beneficial.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | ava | jest |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | Compact bundle size of 942 B enhancing load times. | ✓Very minimal at 6.3 kB, improving usability. |
| Open Issues | ✓62 open issues, suggesting manageable maintenance. | Higher at 237, indicating more ongoing challenges or discussions. |
| Performance | ✓Optimized for performance with concurrent test execution. | Performance is good, but encompasses more overhead due to features. |
| GitHub Stars | Strong community interest with 20.9K stars. | ✓Widely adopted with 45.3K stars, indicating robust support. |
| Documentation | Covers essential features clearly but may lack depth on advanced topics. | ✓Extensive and thorough documentation, great for new users. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Straightforward setup ideal for developers familiar with async testing. | More features result in a steeper learning curve for beginners. |
| Weekly Downloads | Moderate popularity with 558.2K downloads. | ✓Significantly more popular with 38.0M downloads. |
| Test Runner Capability | Efficient at running concurrent tests with a focus on speed. | ✓Comprehensive testing features suitable for various scenarios. |