bee-queue vs bullmq
Side-by-side comparison of bee-queue and bullmq
- Weekly Downloads
- 31.5K
- Stars
- 4.0K
- Gzip Size
- 41.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 37
- Forks
- 222
- Unpacked Size
- 106.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 30
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.9M
- Stars
- 8.4K
- Gzip Size
- 175.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 26m ago
- Open Issues
- 328
- Forks
- 558
- Unpacked Size
- 2.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 19
Download Trends
Verdict
bee-queue is a simple and lightweight task queue designed for applications that require basic job processing with minimal overhead. It is ideal for small to medium projects where a straightforward implementation is needed. On the other hand, bullmq targets larger and more complex applications, offering a more feature-rich framework suitable for advanced requirements such as job priority and scheduling.
When choosing between bee-queue and bullmq, consider the scale of your project and the complexity of your job management needs. If you are working on a smaller application where speed and simplicity are paramount, bee-queue may be the right choice. Conversely, if your project demands extensive features and higher concurrency, bullmq can provide the necessary tools to handle those complexities effectively.
Migration from one package to the other could involve significant changes in job handling, configurations, and potentially modifications to your codebase, especially moving from the lightweight bee-queue to the more comprehensive bullmq, which offers features that may not be present in bee-queue. Notably, bullmq has a higher memory footprint and complexity due to its broader functionality, which should be considered when evaluating your application's architecture.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | bee-queue | bullmq |
|---|---|---|
| Topics | Focused primarily on job-queue and Redis usage. | ✓Broader topics including typescript and multiple programming languages for wider applicability. |
| Version | Last updated in February 2026, indicating ongoing maintenance. | Latest update is in February 2026, ensuring current support. |
| Categories | Categorized simply as Queue, highlighting its specialized nature. | Also a Queue but capable of more complex implementations. |
| Description | A simple and fast job/task queue backed by Redis, focusing on ease of use. | ✓A robust queue system for messages and jobs with extensive functionality based on Redis. |
| Open Issues | ✓37 open issues signal a relatively low level of unresolved problems. | 328 open issues may indicate either complexity or areas needing attention. |
| GitHub Forks | 222 forks suggest moderate community contributions. | ✓556 forks indicate more extensive community involvement. |
| GitHub Stars | 4.0K stars show a respectable level of community interest. | ✓8.4K stars reflect a strong community support and interest. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓At 106.9 kB, it is lightweight and suitable for small projects. | Larger at 2.3 MB, making it less ideal for minimal applications. |
| Weekly Downloads | With 32.9K weekly downloads, it serves a niche audience effectively. | ✓A significantly higher usage at 2.9M downloads, indicating wider adoption. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓At 41.8 kB, it offers low overhead for deployment. | 175.6 kB bundle size adds to the resource requirements. |
| Use Case Complexity | Ideal for straightforward job processing needs. | ✓Better suited for complex job processing with advanced features. |
| Team Experience Required | ✓Easier for newcomers due to its simplicity. | Requires more experience to leverage its full potential effectively. |