cypress vs mocha

Side-by-side comparison of cypress and mocha

cypress v15.10.0 MIT
Weekly Downloads
6.6M
Stars
49.6K
Gzip Size
186 B
License
MIT
Last Updated
3h ago
Open Issues
1.2K
Forks
3.4K
Unpacked Size
4.5 MB
Dependencies
1
mocha v11.7.5 MIT
Weekly Downloads
12.1M
Stars
22.9K
Gzip Size
95.1 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
1d ago
Open Issues
226
Forks
3.1K
Unpacked Size
2.3 MB
Dependencies
19

Download Trends

Download trends for cypress and mocha016.2M32.3M48.5M64.7MFeb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26
cypress
mocha

Verdict

Cypress excels at providing a comprehensive end-to-end testing solution specifically tailored for modern web applications. It serves teams looking for a tool to handle complex testing scenarios across various frameworks, with strong support for UI interactions and real-time feedback.

On the other hand, Mocha is a lightweight and flexible test framework that is ideal for Unit and Integration Testing, particularly for projects that favor a Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) approach. It is well-suited for teams seeking a straightforward testing experience without the overhead of a full testing suite, making it a preferred option for simpler projects or those with considerable experience in JavaScript testing.

When choosing between Cypress and Mocha, teams should consider their project requirements and the complexity of the applications they are testing. Cypress is better for comprehensive end-to-end testing in rich web applications, while Mocha is more suitable for teams needing a versatile framework for smaller-scale tests or those who favor custom test setups.

Detailed Comparison

Criteria cypress mocha
Topics Extensive coverage of various testing scenarios and technologies. Covers fundamental testing methodologies.
License Both packages are licensed under MIT. Both packages are licensed under MIT.
Version Latest version of Cypress at 15.10.0. Latest version of Mocha at 11.7.5.
Categories Specialized in broader testing contexts including end-to-end scenarios. Primarily focuses on unit and integration testing.
Description Focused on modern web end-to-end testing capabilities. A versatile test framework with a simpler approach.
Open Issues 1.2K open issues may indicate ongoing development challenges. 225 open issues suggest a more stable codebase.
GitHub Forks 3.4K forks indicating extensive customization and experimentation. 3.1K forks showing reasonable user interest.
GitHub Stars 49.6K, reflecting a large user base and community contributions. 22.9K, showing a reasonable but smaller community presence.
Unpacked Size Larger at 4.5 MB, indicating a more feature-rich framework. Smaller at 2.3 MB, promoting faster installations.
Weekly Downloads 6.6M downloads indicating strong community usage. 12.0M downloads suggesting higher popularity.
Bundle Size (gzip) Minimal at 186 B, which is efficient for deployment. Larger at 95.1 kB but still reasonable.

Related Comparisons