d3 vs recharts
Side-by-side comparison of d3 and recharts
- Weekly Downloads
- 7.2M
- Stars
- 112.3K
- Gzip Size
- 96.6 kB
- License
- ISC
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 27
- Forks
- 22.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 871.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 34
- Weekly Downloads
- 13.9M
- Stars
- 26.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11h ago
- Open Issues
- 444
- Forks
- 1.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 6.4 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
d3 is a robust, flexible tool geared towards developers who need to create complex data visualizations and manage large datasets. Its extensive features and capabilities make it ideal for those who require fine-tuned control over their visual output, especially in SVG. Meanwhile, recharts caters specifically to React developers looking for an easy-to-use charting library that simplifies the process of incorporating charts into React applications.
For projects focused heavily on React or for teams with less experience in manipulating SVGs and data-driven visualizations, recharts would be the more appropriate choice. Its easier integration and component-based approach make it a better fit for rapid development within React projects. On the other hand, if a project requires sophisticated visualizations or custom chart implementations, d3 would be the better option despite its steeper learning curve.
It's important to note that while d3 excels in flexibility and customization, it may not be as straightforward to implement as recharts, which prioritizes simplicity for React apps. Teams need to consider their own familiarity with data visualization concepts when choosing between the two libraries, as migrating to either involves a trade-off in learning and development time depending on the chosen framework and visualization complexity.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | d3 | recharts |
|---|---|---|
| License | ISC allows for flexible use in both open-source and commercial projects. | MIT is equally permissive, but community preference may favor ISC. |
| Downloads | 7.2 million weekly downloads indicate steady use primarily for in-depth projects. | ✓Higher at 13.9 million weekly downloads, reflecting wider adoption in the React community. |
| Open Issues | ✓Few open issues suggest good maintenance and responsiveness. | Higher number of open issues may indicate a need for further refinement. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓High star count indicates strong community interest and support. | Lower star count, but still significant for its niche audience. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact size of 871.3 kB fits well in projects requiring minimal overhead. | Larger at 6.4 MB, which could be a concern for performance-focused applications. |
| Usage Context | Suitable for developers familiar with SVG and requiring detailed customizations. | ✓Designed for quick integration into React apps, suitable for most use cases. |
| Learning Curve | Steep learning curve due to complexity of features and SVG concepts. | ✓Lower learning curve, ideal for beginners in React development. |
| Community Support | ✓Strong community presence evidenced by high stars and forks. | Smaller community but dedicated, focused on React integration. |
| React Integration | Not focused on React specifically, may require more boilerplate. | ✓Built exclusively for React, simplifying integration and usage. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 96.6 kB, benefiting projects emphasizing load performance. | Size not specified, but likely larger due to additional features. |
| Overall Positioning | Ideal for complex data visualizations and detailed control. | ✓Best for React-specific charting needs with ease of use. |