@formkit/auto-animate vs framer-motion
Side-by-side comparison of @formkit/auto-animate and framer-motion
- Weekly Downloads
- 542.0K
- Stars
- 13.7K
- Gzip Size
- 3.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 36
- Forks
- 248
- Unpacked Size
- 56.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 24.4M
- Stars
- 31.0K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 8h ago
- Open Issues
- 211
- Forks
- 1.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.6 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
@formkit/auto-animate serves developers looking for a lightweight solution to add motion to their applications with minimal setup. It is particularly well-suited for smaller projects or teams that require a straightforward approach to animations without extensive configuration.
In contrast, framer-motion offers a more robust feature set and greater flexibility, making it ideal for larger projects or teams with advanced animation needs. Its higher weekly downloads and GitHub stars indicate a strong community, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and support.
Developers should consider that @formkit/auto-animate has a significantly smaller bundle size, which may benefit performance in simpler applications, while framer-motion's larger size comes with more comprehensive capabilities for complex transitions and animations.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @formkit/auto-animate | framer-motion |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓36 open issues suggest relatively stable maintenance. | 209 open issues may indicate a need for more support. |
| GitHub Stars | 13.7K stars show solid community interest. | ✓31.0K stars reflect a more engaged user base. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2025-12-16, indicating recent activity. | Last updated on 2026-02-06, showing ongoing support. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 56.4 kB, making it easy to integrate. | Larger at 4.6 MB, suitable for extensive features. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Low learning curve, easy for beginners to pick up. | Moderate learning curve, better for experienced developers. |
| Overall Use Case | Best for lightweight animations with minimal setup. | ✓Ideal for complex animations and transitions. |
| Weekly Downloads | 539.8K downloads suggest a smaller user base. | ✓24.3M downloads indicate widespread adoption. |
| Advanced Features | Offers basic animation capabilities. | ✓Includes advanced features for detailed animation control. |
| Community Support | Smaller community may lead to slower response times. | ✓Larger community can provide quicker support and resources. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Very lightweight at 3.3 kB, beneficial for performance. | Substantially larger size can impact load times. |
| Documentation Clarity | Provides straightforward documentation suitable for quick integration. | ✓Extensive documentation for advanced customizations. |