@formkit/tempo vs luxon
Side-by-side comparison of @formkit/tempo and luxon
- Weekly Downloads
- 69.3K
- Stars
- 2.6K
- Gzip Size
- 6.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 16
- Forks
- 36
- Unpacked Size
- 589.1 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 20.7M
- Stars
- 16.4K
- Gzip Size
- 22.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 192
- Forks
- 770
- Unpacked Size
- 4.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
@formkit/tempo offers a straightforward approach to date manipulation in JavaScript and TypeScript, making it ideal for projects with simpler date handling requirements and for developers looking for a lightweight solution. In contrast, luxon provides a more comprehensive suite of features for managing dates, particularly when dealing with timezones and internationalization, making it suitable for applications that require more depth in date operations.
If you are working on a small to medium-sized project where basic date formatting and manipulation are sufficient, @formkit/tempo would likely be a better fit due to its lighter bundle size and ease of use. However, for larger projects or those that require robust timezone handling and additional features, luxon's more extensive functionality and higher adoption could justify the trade-off in size and complexity.
Migration to luxon may require more onboarding time for developers due to its more complex API, while @formkit/tempo's approach may be more intuitive for those with basic needs. Consider your team's familiarity with date handling and whether advanced features like timezone support are crucial for your use case.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @formkit/tempo | luxon |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓16 open issues indicate relatively low maintenance concerns. | 192 open issues may suggest a larger number of ongoing challenges to address. |
| GitHub Forks | 36 forks show limited public interest in contributing. | ✓770 forks demonstrate a willingness to build on luxon's capabilities. |
| GitHub Stars | 2.6K stars suggest moderate interest and community engagement. | ✓16.4K stars indicate a well-regarded project with significant popularity. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2025-12-22, indicating recent activity. | ✓Updated on 2026-02-04, suggesting active ongoing development. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓At 589.1 kB, it remains lightweight for smaller projects. | 4.6 MB for luxon suggests greater feature richness but larger overhead. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Lower complexity with a straightforward API for quick learning. | Higher complexity may require more time to become proficient. |
| Weekly Downloads | 67.2K downloads indicate a growing but smaller user base. | ✓20.7M downloads reflect a strong, active user community. |
| Intended Use Case | Best for simple applications needing basic date operations. | ✓Optimal for complex applications with extensive date requirements. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 6.3 kB, making it efficient for loading. | 22.3 kB indicates a more substantial footprint for luxon. |
| TypeScript Support | Fully supports TypeScript for type safety. | Also provides excellent TypeScript support, including types for complex cases. |
| Overall Positioning | Targeted for lightweight date handling in JavaScript and TypeScript. | ✓Comprehensive date management with timezone and internationalization support. |
| Feature Completeness | Focused on basic date manipulation and formatting. | ✓Offers advanced features like timezone handling and localization. |