jspdf vs pdfkit
Side-by-side comparison of jspdf and pdfkit
- Weekly Downloads
- 8.8M
- Stars
- 31.1K
- Gzip Size
- 241.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3d ago
- Open Issues
- 112
- Forks
- 4.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 30.1 MB
- Dependencies
- 11
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.8M
- Stars
- 10.6K
- Gzip Size
- 260.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11h ago
- Open Issues
- 397
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 6.1 MB
- Dependencies
- 17
Download Trends
Verdict
jspdf is well-suited for web developers looking to create PDFs directly from client-side JavaScript, supporting various functionalities and extensive documentation. Its popularity is reflected in its high weekly downloads and GitHub presence, making it a reliable choice for projects focused on online PDF generation.
In contrast, pdfkit serves Node.js developers seeking server-side PDF generation capabilities. It might appeal more to projects that require a simpler footprint with less overall size, but the lower weekly downloads indicate a smaller user base and possibly less community support.
Choosing jspdf would typically benefit projects with larger teams familiar with extensive documentation and client-side rendering, while pdfkit might be favored in environments emphasizing simplicity and server-side performance. However, developers should note the trade-off in community size and issue management, as pdfkit has more open issues to address.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | jspdf | pdfkit |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license offers flexibility and open-source use. | MIT license also provides similar freedoms. |
| Version | ✓More current version indicating ongoing development and updates. | Older version suggesting more limited recent active maintenance. |
| Audience | Ideal for front-end developers looking for immediate PDF output. | Targeted towards back-end developers needing server-side tools. |
| Bundle Size | ✓Compact bundle size aids in faster loading times for web applications. | Slightly larger bundle size may impact initial load performance. |
| Description | ✓Handles PDF generation from JavaScript with a focus on client-side applications. | Offers server-side PDF generation specifically for Node.js environments. |
| Open Issues | ✓Moderate open issues indicate manageable maintenance. | Higher open issues may signify slower response to bugs. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓Significant number of stars indicates strong community interest. | Fewer stars may reflect lower visibility among developers. |
| Last Updated | ✓Recent update shows active development and feature growth. | Near recent updates but suggests less frequent maintenance. |
| Unpacked Size | Relatively larger size suggesting a richer feature set. | ✓Smaller size indicates a more lightweight library. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Documentation supports easy onboarding for new users. | May require additional exploration for unfamiliar developers. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High weekly downloads show strong community usage and support. | Lower downloads suggest a smaller user base. |
| Community Support | ✓High level of community engagement with many forks. | Lower engagement metrics might limit community resources. |