lexical vs slate
Side-by-side comparison of lexical and slate
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.9M
- Stars
- 22.9K
- Gzip Size
- 46.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3h ago
- Open Issues
- 589
- Forks
- 2.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 1.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.9M
- Stars
- 31.5K
- Gzip Size
- 27.7 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 696
- Forks
- 3.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
Lexical is an extensible text editor framework focused on reliability, accessibility, and performance. It suits developers looking for a robust yet flexible solution for building rich text editors, particularly when ease of integration and performance are priorities.
In scenarios where customizable features are paramount, Slate offers a completely customizable framework, making it ideal for projects that require tailored functionality. Developers with prior experience in building complex editors may gravitate toward Slate for its deeper customizability, while those needing faster implementation may prefer Lexical's reliability and ease of use.
Both Lexical and Slate have substantial GitHub repositories and a healthy number of weekly downloads, but developers should consider their team's proficiency with React frameworks and future maintenance needs when choosing. Lexical's smaller bundle size may facilitate quicker loads, whereas Slate's larger size could be justified by its extensive features and flexibility.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | lexical | slate |
|---|---|---|
| License | Uses the permissive MIT license | Also uses the permissive MIT license |
| Version | Slightly earlier version at 0.40.0 | ✓More mature version at 0.123.0 |
| Categories | Categorized as a Rich Text Editor framework | Also categorized as a Rich Text Editor framework |
| Open Issues | ✓589 issues reported, indicating ongoing development but potential concerns | 696 issues reported, potentially reflecting more complexity or active development tasks |
| GitHub Forks | 2.1K forks, indicating a reasonable level of community engagement | ✓3.3K forks, showing more widespread experimentation |
| GitHub Stars | 22.9K stars, showing strong community support | ✓31.5K stars, reflecting higher community interest |
| Unpacked Size | ✓At 1.6 MB, it's lighter and may lead to faster load times | At 2.2 MB, it's heavier but may offer more features |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easier to pick up for developers new to rich text editors | Potentially steeper based on deep customizability |
| Customizability | Offers extensibility primarily focused on reliability | ✓Highly customizable for diverse rich text editing needs |
| Weekly Downloads | 1.9M downloads, indicating significant usage | 1.9M downloads, showing comparable popularity |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Larger at 46.9 kB, which could impact performance | ✓Smaller at 27.7 kB, likely enhancing performance |
| Community Activity | Active community with substantial contributions | ✓More extensive community activity noted from stars and forks |