PACKAGE · CSS FRAMEWORK

goober

A less than 1KB css-in-js solution

WEEKLY DOWNLOADS 3.5M
STARS 3.3K
FORKS 125
OPEN ISSUES 71
GZIP SIZE 1.3 kB
UNPACKED SIZE 113.5 kB
DEPENDENCIES 1
LAST UPDATED 8mo ago
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

goober downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for goober1 download series from Jun 2025 to May 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.07.5M15.1M22.6M30.1MJun 2025SepDecMarMay 2026
goober
ABOUT GOOBER

Goober is a compact CSS-in-JS library designed to offer a streamlined styling solution with a minimal footprint. It addresses the need for dynamically styled components in modern JavaScript applications without introducing significant overhead, aiming to be one of the smallest libraries in its category. This approach allows developers to manage component styles directly within their JavaScript or TypeScript code, enabling greater flexibility and maintainability.

With a core philosophy centered on simplicity and performance, Goober targets developers who value bundle size optimization and a straightforward API. It's particularly suited for projects where every kilobyte counts, such as static site generators, performance-critical applications, or environments with limited resources. The library eschews complex features for a focused set of capabilities that are both powerful and easy to grasp.

Goober's API features a `styled` tag function, similar to libraries like `styled-components`, which allows you to create styled React components. For instance, `styled('div')` creates a `div` element with associated styles. It also provides hooks like `useStyles` for functional components, enabling direct access to style objects, and `css` for writing raw CSS strings that can be dynamically generated or imported. The library supports theming and basic animations out of the box.

Integration with popular frameworks like React and Preact is seamless, thanks to its hook-based architecture and virtual DOM compatibility. Goober is designed with Server-Side Rendering (SSR) in mind, facilitating the extraction of critical CSS during the build process. Its small bundle size makes it an attractive option for progressive enhancement and for integration into existing build systems without major configuration changes.

The library boasts an extremely small bundle size, reporting a gzip size of just 1.3 kB, which is a significant advantage for performance-sensitive applications. This miniature size is achieved through a focused feature set and optimized internal architecture. The project is actively maintained, with recent updates indicating ongoing development, though the number of open issues (70) suggests areas for community input and potential contributions.

While Goober is highly efficient, it may lack the extensive feature set found in larger CSS-in-JS solutions. For instance, advanced features like nested selectors with complex context awareness or sophisticated theme switching mechanisms might require custom implementations or supplementary libraries. Developers accustomed to the broader ecosystem and plugin support of more mature, larger libraries might find Goober's scope more constrained.

WHEN TO USE
  • When building highly optimized JavaScript applications where minimizing bundle size is a primary concern.
  • For projects utilizing React or Preact, benefiting from its hook-based API and component-centric styling.
  • In Server-Side Rendering (SSR) environments seeking efficient extraction of critical CSS without significant build tool complexity.
  • When creating reusable UI components that require dynamic styling based on props or state within a functional component using `useStyles`.
  • For developers who prefer a concise and focused API over the extensive feature set of larger CSS-in-JS libraries.
  • To integrate dynamic styling into static site generators aiming for the fastest possible initial page load.
  • When aiming for a primitive styling solution that abstracts away CSS complexity with minimal overhead.
WHEN NOT TO USE
  • If your project extensively relies on complex nested selectors or advanced CSS features not directly supported by Goober's core API, consider a more comprehensive solution.
  • When only static CSS is required and dynamic styling capabilities are unnecessary, native CSS or simple CSS modules might be more appropriate.
  • If you require an extensive plugin ecosystem or deep integration with tooling that is mature in larger CSS-in-JS libraries, Goober's focused scope may be limiting.
  • For large enterprise applications with teams accustomed to the vast feature set and established patterns of larger styling libraries, the transition cost to Goober might be considerable.
  • If you need advanced theming capabilities beyond basic context propagation, you may need to implement custom solutions on top of Goober.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

COMPARISONS 8
goober vs bulma ★ 50.1K · 167.8K/wk goober vs tailwindcss ★ 95.4K · 58.5M/wk goober vs @linaria/core ★ 12.3K · 316.2K/wk goober vs bootstrap ★ 174.3K · 3.0M/wk goober vs @emotion/react ★ 18.0K · 8.7M/wk goober vs styled-components ★ 41.0K · 5.1M/wk goober vs @pandacss/dev ★ 6.1K · 172.8K/wk goober vs sass ★ 4.2K · 13.1M/wk