PACKAGE · PDF

pdfjs-dist

Generic build of Mozilla's PDF.js library.

WEEKLY DOWNLOADS 18.3M
STARS 53.7K
FORKS 10.6K
OPEN ISSUES 424
GZIP SIZE 127.9 kB
UNPACKED SIZE 34.5 MB
LAST UPDATED 5mo ago
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

pdfjs-dist downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for pdfjs-dist1 download series from Aug 2025 to Jul 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.022.4M44.8M67.2M89.6MAug 2025NovFebMayJul 2026
pdfjs-dist
ABOUT PDFJS-DIST

pdfjs-dist provides a core JavaScript library for parsing and rendering PDF documents within web browsers. It addresses the challenge of displaying PDF content natively on the web without relying on external plugins or server-side conversion, enabling rich, interactive PDF experiences directly in client-side applications.

The library is a generic build of Mozilla's PDF.js project, emphasizing broad compatibility and adherence to web standards. Its primary audience includes front-end developers building applications that require integrated PDF viewing, manipulation, or annotation capabilities, such as document management systems, e-learning platforms, or form-filling tools.

Key API patterns involve asynchronous operations for loading and rendering pages, such as the `getDocument` function which returns a promise for a `PDFDocumentProxy` object. Developers interact with this proxy to fetch individual pages as `PDFPageProxy` objects, enabling detailed control over rendering via the `render` method, which takes a canvas rendering context.

Integration points are extensive, fitting seamlessly into various JavaScript frameworks and build tools. Its modular nature allows for integration with bundlers like Webpack or Rollup, and it can be used with popular front-end frameworks such as React, Vue, or Angular by leveraging lifecycle methods or hooks to manage PDF rendering within component trees.

With a substantial GitHub community (53.6K stars, 10.7K forks) and high weekly downloads (17.6M), pdfjs-dist demonstrates significant maturity and widespread adoption. Its unpacked size is 34.5 MB, with a gzip bundle size of 127.9 kB, presenting a trade-off between feature richness and client-side footprint.

Developers should be aware of the asynchronous nature of most operations, requiring careful management of promises and state. While powerful, extensive customization might involve deeper dives into the rendering pipeline, and for very simple PDF display needs, a lighter alternative might be considered to reduce bundle size, although pdfjs-dist is actively maintained with many open issues (415) suggesting ongoing development.

WHEN TO USE
  • When embedding or displaying PDF documents directly within a web application, leveraging the `getDocument` and `render` APIs.
  • For creating interactive PDF viewers with features like page navigation, zooming, and text selection using the PDF page rendering context.
  • When building custom PDF annotation tools by manipulating the canvas output of individual pages.
  • For programmatically extracting text or metadata from PDF files on the client-side using the `getTextContent` or document metadata properties.
  • When integrating with frameworks that require component-based rendering of dynamic content, managing PDF loading within component lifecycles.
  • For developing offline-first applications where PDF viewing capabilities need to be available without constant server communication.
WHEN NOT TO USE
  • If your application only requires linking to PDFs rather than inline viewing, as the package adds significant bundle size.
  • When focusing solely on PDF form submission where simple HTML forms suffice, avoiding unnecessary rendering logic.
  • If your primary need is PDF generation or modification rather than viewing, consider server-side libraries or specialized client-side PDF creation tools.
  • For extremely low-resource environments where even a 127.9 kB (gzip) bundle is prohibitive, explore simpler text or image display alternatives.
  • If you strictly need a static, non-interactive display of static PDF content without any viewer controls, a server-side pre-rendered image or a static HTML conversion might be more efficient.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

COMPARISONS 4
pdfjs-dist vs puppeteer ★ 93.5K · 9.5M/wk pdfjs-dist vs jspdf ★ 31.3K · 11.7M/wk pdfjs-dist vs @react-pdf/renderer ★ 16.7K · 4.0M/wk pdfjs-dist vs pdfkit ★ 10.7K · 4.9M/wk