pnpm vs yarn
Side-by-side comparison of pnpm and yarn
- Weekly Downloads
- 47.5M
- Stars
- 33.9K
- Gzip Size
- 1.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 31m ago
- Open Issues
- 2.1K
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 17.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 7.2M
- Stars
- 41.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- BSD-2-Clause
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 2.1K
- Forks
- 2.7K
- Unpacked Size
- 5.3 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
pnpm excels in speed and efficiency, making it suitable for large projects and teams focused on optimizing disk space usage. With significantly higher weekly downloads and a growing community, it appeals to developers seeking rapid dependency management while keeping resource consumption low.
On the other hand, yarn offers a secure and reliable option for dependency management, boasting a larger number of GitHub stars which indicates a well-established community. It is well-suited for projects where stability and proven methodologies are valued, particularly among teams with more traditional practices.
When considering migration, users may find that pnpm's more complex features may require additional learning, while yarn's established usage patterns could facilitate quicker onboarding for teams familiar with it. Weighing project size and team experience against feature sets will guide the final decision.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | pnpm | yarn |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT, widely permissive and user-friendly. | BSD-2-Clause, similarly permissive but less common. |
| Version | ✓Latest version 10.29.1, indicating ongoing updates. | Stable version 1.22.22, but with fewer recent updates. |
| Categories | Clearly categorized as a package manager. | Also categorized similarly, making them directly comparable. |
| Description | Focuses on speed and disk space efficiency. | Emphasizes reliability and security in dependency management. |
| Open Issues | 2.1K open issues, which is manageable but substantial. | Also has 2.1K open issues, showing similar levels of community feedback. |
| GitHub Forks | 1.3K forks, indicating good potential for custom contributions. | ✓2.7K forks, suggesting a larger pool of derived work. |
| GitHub Stars | 33.9K stars, showing notable community interest. | ✓41.6K stars, reflecting substantial developer support. |
| Unpacked Size | 17.6 MB, larger size may suggest more features or complexity. | ✓5.3 MB, presenting a lighter package for simpler needs. |
| Topics Coverage | ✓Covers a wide range of topics related to modern package management. | Focuses on JavaScript and npm specifics, with a narrower scope. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓47.5M downloads, indicating strong adoption. | 7.2M downloads, suggesting a smaller user base. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓1.5 kB, efficient for browser usage. | Not listed, but generally heavier than pnpm. |