@auth/core vs. @supabase/supabase-js
Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 16 criteria
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.4M
- Stars
- 28.3K
- Gzip Size
- 47.9 kB
- License
- ISC
- Last Updated
- 4mo ago
- Open Issues
- 591
- Forks
- 4.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 1.9 MB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.4M
- Stars
- 4.5K
- Gzip Size
- 58.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 53
- Forks
- 708
- Unpacked Size
- 617.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 9
@auth/core vs @supabase/supabase-js downloads — last 12 months
Criteria — @auth/core vs @supabase/supabase-js
- Learning Curve
- @auth/corePotentially steeper due to its focus on flexible configuration and adapter patterns.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Generally smoother for projects committed to Supabase, mapping directly to platform features.
- Ecosystem Coupling
- @auth/core ✓Loosely coupled, facilitating easier migration or integration with other services.@supabase/supabase-jsTightly coupled with the Supabase ecosystem, potentially increasing migration effort.
- API Design Paradigm
- @auth/coreInterface-driven with distinct adapters for different auth providers.@supabase/supabase-jsObject-oriented client that mirrors Supabase's service structure.
- Feature Set Breadth
- @auth/coreSpecialized, offering deep functionality within the authentication domain.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Broad, covering authentication, database, real-time, storage, and more.
- Customization Approach
- @auth/core ✓Extensible via an adapter system for plugging in different auth providers.@supabase/supabase-jsCustomization primarily through Supabase platform features and client-side logic.
- Primary Use Case Focus
- @auth/coreCore authentication layer for web applications, adaptable to various architectures.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Client SDK for interacting with the Supabase platform's backend services.
- Real-time Capabilities
- @auth/coreDoes not inherently provide real-time data synchronization features.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Includes robust real-time subscriptions for database changes and events.
- Configuration Complexity
- @auth/coreCan require intricate configuration to set up custom authentication flows or providers.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Configuration is often simpler, focusing on Supabase project credentials and settings.
- Backend Integration Scope
- @auth/coreFocused purely on authentication, leaving data storage and other services to the developer.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Tightly integrated with Supabase's BaaS features including database, auth, and storage.
- Data Storage Independence
- @auth/core ✓Allows developers to choose and manage their own data storage solutions.@supabase/supabase-jsAssumes and integrates with Supabase's managed PostgreSQL database.
- Development Speed for BaaS
- @auth/coreDoes not accelerate backend BaaS development directly; focuses on auth integration.@supabase/supabase-js ✓Significantly accelerates full-stack development by abstracting backend services.
- Startup Bundle Size Impact
- @auth/core ✓Minimal impact, contributing less to initial page load times.@supabase/supabase-jsSlightly larger, a consideration for highly performance-sensitive applications.
- TypeScript Support Quality
- @auth/coreDesigned with TypeScript first, offering robust type safety for auth flows.@supabase/supabase-jsWell-typed and comprehensive TypeScript support for all Supabase SDK features.
- Frontend Framework Agnosticism
- @auth/core ✓Highly framework-agnostic, designed to be integrated into any JavaScript environment.@supabase/supabase-jsWhile isomorphic, often used within frameworks that pair well with Supabase projects.
- Authentication Provider Integration
- @auth/core ✓Explicitly designed to integrate a wide array of OAuth, OIDC, and database credentials.@supabase/supabase-jsManages its own user authentication system, with limited external provider integrations exposed directly via SDK.
- Authentication Strategy Flexibility
- @auth/core ✓Offers adapters for diverse authentication providers and custom strategies.@supabase/supabase-jsProvides an integrated authentication service as part of a broader BaaS offering.
| Criteria | @auth/core | @supabase/supabase-js |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Curve | Potentially steeper due to its focus on flexible configuration and adapter patterns. | ✓ Generally smoother for projects committed to Supabase, mapping directly to platform features. |
| Ecosystem Coupling | ✓ Loosely coupled, facilitating easier migration or integration with other services. | Tightly coupled with the Supabase ecosystem, potentially increasing migration effort. |
| API Design Paradigm | Interface-driven with distinct adapters for different auth providers. | Object-oriented client that mirrors Supabase's service structure. |
| Feature Set Breadth | Specialized, offering deep functionality within the authentication domain. | ✓ Broad, covering authentication, database, real-time, storage, and more. |
| Customization Approach | ✓ Extensible via an adapter system for plugging in different auth providers. | Customization primarily through Supabase platform features and client-side logic. |
| Primary Use Case Focus | Core authentication layer for web applications, adaptable to various architectures. | ✓ Client SDK for interacting with the Supabase platform's backend services. |
| Real-time Capabilities | Does not inherently provide real-time data synchronization features. | ✓ Includes robust real-time subscriptions for database changes and events. |
| Configuration Complexity | Can require intricate configuration to set up custom authentication flows or providers. | ✓ Configuration is often simpler, focusing on Supabase project credentials and settings. |
| Backend Integration Scope | Focused purely on authentication, leaving data storage and other services to the developer. | ✓ Tightly integrated with Supabase's BaaS features including database, auth, and storage. |
| Data Storage Independence | ✓ Allows developers to choose and manage their own data storage solutions. | Assumes and integrates with Supabase's managed PostgreSQL database. |
| Development Speed for BaaS | Does not accelerate backend BaaS development directly; focuses on auth integration. | ✓ Significantly accelerates full-stack development by abstracting backend services. |
| Startup Bundle Size Impact | ✓ Minimal impact, contributing less to initial page load times. | Slightly larger, a consideration for highly performance-sensitive applications. |
| TypeScript Support Quality | Designed with TypeScript first, offering robust type safety for auth flows. | Well-typed and comprehensive TypeScript support for all Supabase SDK features. |
| Frontend Framework Agnosticism | ✓ Highly framework-agnostic, designed to be integrated into any JavaScript environment. | While isomorphic, often used within frameworks that pair well with Supabase projects. |
| Authentication Provider Integration | ✓ Explicitly designed to integrate a wide array of OAuth, OIDC, and database credentials. | Manages its own user authentication system, with limited external provider integrations exposed directly via SDK. |
| Authentication Strategy Flexibility | ✓ Offers adapters for diverse authentication providers and custom strategies. | Provides an integrated authentication service as part of a broader BaaS offering. |
The core philosophy of @auth/core centers on providing a flexible and framework-agnostic authentication solution, primarily for web applications. It aims to be a foundational layer, enabling developers to integrate various authentication strategies with minimal boilerplate and maximum control. This makes it an excellent choice for projects that require a highly customizable authentication flow or need to support multiple authentication providers across different frontend or backend frameworks.
@supabase/supabase-js, on the other hand, is designed as an all-in-one JavaScript SDK for Supabase, a Backend as a Service (BaaS) platform. Its strength lies in seamlessly connecting applications to a Supabase project, which includes a PostgreSQL database, authentication, real-time subscriptions, storage, and more. Developers adopting @supabase/supabase-js benefit from rapid development by leveraging a comprehensive suite of backend services through a single, cohesive SDK.
An architecturally significant difference lies in their scope and integration. @auth/core focuses solely on authentication mechanisms, offering adapters for various providers like OAuth, email/password, and JWTs, without dictating data storage or other backend concerns. In contrast, @supabase/supabase-js is deeply integrated with the Supabase ecosystem, acting as the client-side interface to its backend services, including its own robust authentication system which is tightly coupled with its database and other BaaS features.
Regarding their extension and plugin models, @auth/core adopts an adapter-based approach. This allows developers to plug in different authentication providers (e.g., Google, GitHub, custom databases) by implementing specific adapter interfaces. @supabase/supabase-js, while also extensible through Supabase's own features like Edge Functions, primarily offers its SDK as a direct interface to the Supabase backend. Customization often involves leveraging Supabase's platform capabilities rather than a pluggable module system within the SDK itself.
In terms of developer experience, @auth/core offers a high degree of control, which can translate to a steeper initial learning curve for understanding its adapter system and configuration options. However, its explicit design for TypeScript provides excellent type safety. @supabase/supabase-js provides a more opinionated yet streamlined developer experience for projects already committed to Supabase. Its SDK is well-typed and intuitively maps to Supabase's features, making common backend tasks like database queries or user authentication very straightforward.
While bundle size is a consideration for frontend applications, @auth/core typically presents a smaller footprint (47.9 kB gzip) compared to @supabase/supabase-js (58.1 kB gzip). This difference, while not drastic, can be more significant for performance-critical applications or those aiming for minimal JavaScript loading times. @auth/core's focused nature contributes to its leaner size, whereas @supabase/supabase-js includes functionalities for a broader range of backend interactions.
For practical recommendations, choose @auth/core when you need a highly adaptable authentication layer that can be integrated into existing or custom backend architectures, or when you want to manage your own data storage independently. It's ideal for microservices or federated identity solutions. Conversely, select @supabase/supabase-js if you are building a new application and want to leverage a comprehensive, managed backend service, especially if you're already using or considering Supabase for your database, authentication, and other cloud functions.
Considering long-term maintenance and ecosystem lock-in, @auth/core offers more freedom. As it's framework-agnostic and focuses solely on authentication, migrating away from it or integrating other services is less likely to introduce architectural friction. @supabase/supabase-js, however, binds your application more closely to the Supabase ecosystem. While Supabase is a robust platform, migrating away from its proprietary services could involve more significant refactoring of your backend interactions and data management.
Regarding niche use cases and emerging trends, @auth/core is well-suited for scenarios involving complex, multi-tenant authentication or situations requiring advanced security features like fine-grained access control that can be built upon its flexible foundation. Its focus on authentication standards also positions it well for adopting future identity protocols. @supabase/supabase-js excels in rapid prototyping and full-stack development with Supabase, allowing developers to quickly implement real-time features and data synchronization, aligning with trends in collaborative and dynamic web applications.
CORRECTIONS
Spot wrong data here?Spot wrong data on this page?
A short note helps us fix it.A short note helps us fix it. We read every one; confirmed fixes ship in the next nightly build.
Anonymous · No account · No email back