COMPARISON · AUTHENTICATION

@supabase/supabase-js vs. lucia

Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 14 criteria

@supabase/supabase-js v2.107.0 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
10.8M
Stars
4.5K
Gzip Size
56.0 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
3mo ago
Open Issues
58
Forks
660
Unpacked Size
646.4 kB
Dependencies
9
lucia v3.2.2 · MIT · DEPRECATED
Weekly Downloads
106.1K
Stars
10.5K
Gzip Size
4.2 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
1y ago
Open Issues
23
Forks
523
Unpacked Size
46.0 kB
Dependencies
4
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

@supabase/supabase-js vs lucia downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for @supabase/supabase-js and lucia2 download series from Jun 2025 to May 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.020.2M40.3M60.5M80.7MJun 2025SepDecMarMay 2026
@supabase/supabase-js
lucia
FEATURE COMPARISON

Criteria — @supabase/supabase-js vs lucia

API Surface Area
@supabase/supabase-js
Broader API surface covering database, auth, storage, and real-time.
lucia
Narrower, more focused API centered on authentication state and flows.
Backend Coupling
@supabase/supabase-js
Tightly coupled with Supabase services (PostgREST, Supabase Auth).
lucia
Decoupled from specific backend providers, offering high flexibility.
Integration Scope
@supabase/supabase-js
Comprehensive SDK for the entire Supabase platform (database, auth, real-time).
lucia
Focused authentication library, designed for integration with any backend.
Core Functionality
@supabase/supabase-js
Provides full-stack SDK including database query builder and real-time subscriptions.
lucia
Specializes in session management, OAuth, and advanced authentication flows.
Authentication Focus
@supabase/supabase-js
Provides authentication as one feature within a broader backend suite.
lucia
Specializes purely in authentication, offering advanced features.
Dependency Footprint
@supabase/supabase-js
Includes dependencies for various backend services it integrates.
lucia
Minimal dependencies, promoting lean application builds.
Ecosystem Integration
@supabase/supabase-js
Deep integration within the Supabase product suite.
lucia
Designed for broad integration across diverse frontend and backend stacks.
Bundle Size Efficiency
@supabase/supabase-js
Larger bundle size (56.0 kB gzip) due to comprehensive features.
lucia
Minimal bundle size (4.2 kB gzip) due to focused functionality.
Real-time Capabilities
@supabase/supabase-js
Includes built-in real-time subscriptions for database changes.
lucia
Does not include real-time data synchronization; focuses on auth state.
TypeScript Integration
@supabase/supabase-js
Excellent TypeScript support, leveraging Supabase's generated types.
lucia
Strong TypeScript support promoting type-safe authentication code.
Database Interaction Model
@supabase/supabase-js
Utilizes PostgREST for database access, enabling SQL-like queries.
lucia
Does not provide direct database interaction capabilities.
Developer Choice - Backend
@supabase/supabase-js
Best for developers committed to the Supabase PaaS ecosystem.
lucia
Ideal for developers building with custom backends or mixing providers.
Data Management Abstraction
@supabase/supabase-js
Abstracts database operations via PostgREST, enabling direct SQL interaction.
lucia
Focuses on authentication state, leaving data storage to the developer.
Learning Curve - Platform vs. Library
@supabase/supabase-js
Learning curve involves understanding the Supabase platform and its services.
lucia
Learning curve focuses on flexible authentication patterns and integration.
VERDICT

The @supabase/supabase-js SDK is designed as a comprehensive client library for interacting with Supabase, a full-stack Firebase alternative. Its core philosophy is to provide a unified interface for all Supabase services, including database operations (PostgREST), authentication, and real-time subscriptions. This makes it an ideal choice for developers looking to leverage the entire Supabase platform for their backend needs, from rapid prototyping to full-scale applications.

Lucia, on the other hand, presents itself as a highly focused and flexible authentication library. Its philosophy centers on abstracting away the complexities of authentication, allowing developers to integrate it seamlessly into various frontend and backend frameworks without being tied to a specific backend-as-a-service provider. Lucia is tailored for developers who require fine-grained control over their authentication flows and prefer to manage their own database or backend infrastructure.

A key architectural difference lies in their scope. @supabase/supabase-js is an integral part of the Supabase ecosystem, tightly coupled with its PostgREST API for database interactions and its auth service. It exposes methods for direct database queries, auth management, and real-time listeners. Lucia, conversely, operates at a higher level of abstraction for authentication, providing session management and OAuth flows, but leaving database and actual user data storage to the developer's chosen solution.

Another technical distinction is their approach to state management and reactivity. @supabase/supabase-js offers real-time subscriptions that push data changes from the database directly to the client, enabling reactive UIs when combined with frontend frameworks. Lucia, while focused on authentication state, doesn't inherently dictate how application data should be managed or synchronized reactively; it focuses solely on user session validity and authentication status.

From a developer experience perspective, @supabase/supabase-js offers a highly integrated setup for Supabase users, with excellent TypeScript support and clear documentation for its extensive feature set. The learning curve is mainly tied to understanding the Supabase platform itself. Lucia excels in its flexibility and minimal API surface for authentication concerns, also featuring strong TypeScript support, making it easy to integrate into existing projects with minimal friction. Its focused nature reduces the cognitive load specifically related to auth.

Performance and bundle size significantly favor lucia. With a gzipped bundle size of 4.2 kB and an unpacked size of 46.0 kB, lucia is exceptionally lightweight. @supabase/supabase-js, while still performant for its scope, has a gzipped bundle size of 56.0 kB and an unpacked size of 646.4 kB, reflecting its broader functionality and dependencies as a full-stack client. For applications where bundle size is critical, lucia offers a distinct advantage.

Practically, you would choose @supabase/supabase-js if you are committing to the Supabase ecosystem for your backend, needing a seamless integration for database, auth, and real-time features. Use it for projects where Supabase's integrated offerings align with your application's requirements, such as building MVPs rapidly or migrating from monolithic backends. Choose lucia when you need a robust, yet decoupled, authentication solution that works with any backend or database, offering maximum flexibility and control over your authentication logic, especially in complex or custom backend architectures.

In terms of ecosystem and maintenance, @supabase/supabase-js benefits from being part of the growing Supabase platform, which has a strong community and clear roadmap. Its maintenance is tied to the Supabase project's evolution. Lucia, with its broader applicability, has a vibrant and independent community. Its focus on authentication means its evolution is geared towards security best practices and a wide range of integration patterns, ensuring long-term maintainability and adaptability.

Considering niche use cases, @supabase/supabase-js is uniquely positioned for applications that rely heavily on PostgreSQL features and want to expose them directly via a RESTful API through PostgREST, managed by Supabase. Lucia shines in multi-backend authentication scenarios or when integrating authentication into legacy systems where a full BaaS might be overkill or incompatible. Its adaptability makes it suitable for JAMstack architectures requiring flexible auth providers.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

RELATED COMPARISONS 8
@supabase/supabase-js vs jwt-decode ★ 7.9K · 18.3M/wk @auth0/nextjs-auth0 vs @supabase/supabase-js ★ 6.8K · 11.0M/wk @auth/core vs @supabase/supabase-js ★ 32.7K · 12.6M/wk @supabase/supabase-js vs firebase ★ 9.6K · 14.7M/wk @supabase/supabase-js vs next-auth ★ 32.7K · 13.2M/wk @clerk/nextjs vs @supabase/supabase-js ★ 6.2K · 11.6M/wk @supabase/supabase-js vs jose ★ 12.1K · 50.9M/wk @supabase/supabase-js vs aws-amplify ★ 14.0K · 11.5M/wk