@supabase/supabase-js vs. jose
Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 14 criteria
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.4M
- Stars
- 4.5K
- Gzip Size
- 58.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 53
- Forks
- 708
- Unpacked Size
- 617.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 9
- Weekly Downloads
- 94.4M
- Stars
- 7.7K
- Gzip Size
- 18.2 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 0
- Forks
- 378
- Unpacked Size
- 246.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
@supabase/supabase-js vs jose downloads — last 12 months
Criteria — @supabase/supabase-js vs jose
- Learning Curve
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓Intuitive for Supabase users, with a moderate learning curve for advanced features.joseRequires understanding of JOSE specifications, potentially a steeper curve.
- Security Focus
- @supabase/supabase-jsManages authentication flows and authorization for Supabase.jose ✓Provides low-level cryptographic primitives for secure data handling.
- Target Audience
- @supabase/supabase-jsDevelopers building applications on the Supabase platform.joseDevelopers needing to handle JSON Web standards for security.
- Abstraction Level
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓High-level API for backend services and data operations.joseLower-level API for cryptographic encoding and decoding.
- Protocol Handling
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓Manages REST and WebSocket interactions with Supabase.joseHandles JOSE-defined data formats and algorithms.
- Core Functionality
- @supabase/supabase-jsProvides an all-in-one client for the Supabase BaaS platform.joseImplements cryptographic standards for JWT, JWS, JWE, JWK.
- TypeScript Support
- @supabase/supabase-jsExcellent, with comprehensive type definitions for Supabase services.joseExcellent, with robust typing for cryptographic operations.
- Feature Set Breadth
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓Broad, encompassing database, auth, storage, and real-time features.joseNarrow and deep, focused exclusively on JOSE cryptographic standards.
- Platform Dependency
- @supabase/supabase-jsTightly coupled with the Supabase ecosystem.jose ✓Runtimes agnostic, supporting Node.js, Deno, Bun, browsers, and more.
- Scope of Integration
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓Integrates with Supabase's database, auth, storage, and real-time.joseFocuses solely on JOSE specifications for cryptographic operations.
- Querying Capabilities
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓Provides a JavaScript ORM-like interface for PostgreSQL queries.joseDoes not offer database query capabilities.
- Bundle Size Efficiency
- @supabase/supabase-jsModerate, at 58.1 kB gzipped, due to its comprehensive nature.jose ✓Highly efficient, at 18.2 kB gzipped, due to its specialized focus.
- Real-time Capabilities
- @supabase/supabase-js ✓Built-in support for real-time subscriptions via WebSockets.joseNot directly involved with real-time data streams, focuses on token security.
- Cross-Runtime Compatibility
- @supabase/supabase-jsPrimarily targets Node.js and browser environments for Supabase interaction.jose ✓Explicitly designed for broad compatibility across Node.js, Deno, Bun, Workers, and browsers.
| Criteria | @supabase/supabase-js | jose |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Curve | ✓ Intuitive for Supabase users, with a moderate learning curve for advanced features. | Requires understanding of JOSE specifications, potentially a steeper curve. |
| Security Focus | Manages authentication flows and authorization for Supabase. | ✓ Provides low-level cryptographic primitives for secure data handling. |
| Target Audience | Developers building applications on the Supabase platform. | Developers needing to handle JSON Web standards for security. |
| Abstraction Level | ✓ High-level API for backend services and data operations. | Lower-level API for cryptographic encoding and decoding. |
| Protocol Handling | ✓ Manages REST and WebSocket interactions with Supabase. | Handles JOSE-defined data formats and algorithms. |
| Core Functionality | Provides an all-in-one client for the Supabase BaaS platform. | Implements cryptographic standards for JWT, JWS, JWE, JWK. |
| TypeScript Support | Excellent, with comprehensive type definitions for Supabase services. | Excellent, with robust typing for cryptographic operations. |
| Feature Set Breadth | ✓ Broad, encompassing database, auth, storage, and real-time features. | Narrow and deep, focused exclusively on JOSE cryptographic standards. |
| Platform Dependency | Tightly coupled with the Supabase ecosystem. | ✓ Runtimes agnostic, supporting Node.js, Deno, Bun, browsers, and more. |
| Scope of Integration | ✓ Integrates with Supabase's database, auth, storage, and real-time. | Focuses solely on JOSE specifications for cryptographic operations. |
| Querying Capabilities | ✓ Provides a JavaScript ORM-like interface for PostgreSQL queries. | Does not offer database query capabilities. |
| Bundle Size Efficiency | Moderate, at 58.1 kB gzipped, due to its comprehensive nature. | ✓ Highly efficient, at 18.2 kB gzipped, due to its specialized focus. |
| Real-time Capabilities | ✓ Built-in support for real-time subscriptions via WebSockets. | Not directly involved with real-time data streams, focuses on token security. |
| Cross-Runtime Compatibility | Primarily targets Node.js and browser environments for Supabase interaction. | ✓ Explicitly designed for broad compatibility across Node.js, Deno, Bun, Workers, and browsers. |
The @supabase/supabase-js SDK is designed as a comprehensive client for the Supabase backend-as-a-service platform. Its core philosophy revolves around providing a unified interface for interacting with Supabase's suite of tools, including its PostgreSQL database, authentication services, real-time subscriptions, and storage capabilities. This makes it an ideal choice for developers building applications on top of Supabase, offering a streamlined developer experience for common backend operations.
The primary audience for @supabase/supabase-js consists of developers who have chosen Supabase as their backend solution and require a robust, isomorphic JavaScript client to interface with it. This includes frontend developers working with frameworks like React, Vue, or Svelte, as well as backend developers using Node.js, who want to leverage Supabase's features without managing their own infrastructure. The SDK aims to abstract away much of the complexity of interacting with various backend services.
A key architectural difference lies in their scope and purpose. @supabase/supabase-js is a full-fledged client library for a specific BaaS platform, orchestrating calls to multiple Supabase APIs like PostgREST for database access, GoTrue for authentication, and Realtime for subscriptions. In contrast, jose is a focused cryptographic library specifically for implementing JSON Web Algorithms (JWA), JSON Web Signatures (JWS), JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Tokens (JWT), JSON Web Keys (JWK), and JWK Sets. It deals with the underlying security primitives rather than a broader application backend.
Technically, @supabase/supabase-js provides a high-level abstraction over REST and WebSocket protocols to interact with Supabase services. It includes features like automatic token refresh, real-time data synchronization, and complex query building through its JavaScript API that maps to PostgREST. Jose, on the other hand, operates at a lower level, focusing on the precise encoding, decoding, signing, and encryption of data according to JOSE standards. Its implementation is designed for interoperability across various JavaScript runtimes, prioritizing adherence to cryptographic specifications.
In terms of developer experience, @supabase/supabase-js offers a more opinionated and integrated workflow, especially for Supabase users. Its API is designed to be intuitive for database operations, auth flows, and real-time features, with strong TypeScript support enhancing type safety. Jose, while also offering excellent TypeScript support and comprehensive documentation for its cryptographic functions, presents a steeper learning curve due to its specialized domain. Developers need a solid understanding of JWT and related JOSE specifications to effectively utilize its capabilities beyond basic token validation.
Performance and bundle size considerations strongly favor jose. With a gzipped bundle size of 18.2 kB and a significantly smaller unpacked size, jose is exceptionally lightweight. @supabase/supabase-js, by contrast, has a gzipped bundle size of 58.1 kB, reflecting its broader feature set and integration with multiple backend services. For applications where minimizing JavaScript payload is critical, jose offers a clear advantage due to its specialized, single-purpose design.
Practically, you would choose @supabase/supabase-js if you are building an application that relies on the Supabase platform for its backend. It simplifies integrating with Supabase's authentication, database, storage, and real-time features into your frontend or Node.js application. Conversely, you would opt for jose when your application needs to handle JWTs, sign or verify cryptographic operations, or encrypt/decrypt data according to JOSE standards, independent of any specific BaaS provider. This is common in authentication microservices, API security layers, or when integrating with third-party systems that use JWTs.
Regarding ecosystem and long-term maintenance, @supabase/supabase-js is tightly coupled with the Supabase ecosystem. Its evolution is directly tied to Supabase's roadmap, ensuring seamless integration as Supabase itself develops. jose, being a foundational cryptographic library, has a more general-purpose role. Its maintenance is focused on adhering to evolving JOSE standards and ensuring compatibility across a wide array of JavaScript runtimes, making it a stable, long-term dependency for cryptographic tasks across different environments.
Niche use cases and emerging trends further distinguish these packages. @supabase/supabase-js is adept at enabling real-time collaborative features and complex data synchronization patterns inherent in modern web applications built on platforms like Supabase. Jose is crucial for implementing secure API authentication mechanisms using JWTs, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in microservices architectures and serverless functions. Its broad runtime support also positions it well for the growing adoption of alternative JavaScript runtimes like Deno and Bun, ensuring its relevance in diverse deployment scenarios.
CORRECTIONS
Spot wrong data here?Spot wrong data on this page?
A short note helps us fix it.A short note helps us fix it. We read every one; confirmed fixes ship in the next nightly build.
Anonymous · No account · No email back