axios vs ofetch
Side-by-side comparison of axios and ofetch
- Weekly Downloads
- 85.3M
- Stars
- 108.6K
- Gzip Size
- 57.7 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 10h ago
- Open Issues
- 314
- Forks
- 11.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 27
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.9M
- Stars
- 5.1K
- Gzip Size
- 37.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 62
- Forks
- 151
- Unpacked Size
- 63.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
axios is a robust HTTP client that's widely adopted and serves projects requiring extensive HTTP features, making it suitable for larger applications and teams looking for rich community support. With its significant weekly downloads and GitHub presence, axios is a go-to for developers seeking reliability and comprehensive documentation.
ofetch is a lightweight alternative that aims to enhance the native fetch API experience. It's ideal for smaller projects or teams looking for simplicity and efficiency, as it has a smaller footprint and modern API styling while still being versatile across different environments.
When considering migration or adoption, axios might take longer to integrate due to its broader feature set and larger codebase, while ofetch provides a quicker setup and faster learning curve for teams familiar with the fetch API. Teams should weigh their need for extensive functionality against the desire for simplicity and lighter dependencies.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | axios | ofetch |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT License, permissive and widely accepted. | MIT License, same advantages as axios. |
| Version | The latest version is stable and mature. | ✓Newer version with ongoing improvements. |
| Description | Promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js, well-established and feature-rich. | A better fetch API; simpler and more lightweight. |
| Open Issues | Current count of 314 indicates activity but manageable for a mature library. | ✓62 open issues signify lesser user feedback or newer. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓Highly forked indicating strong community engagement. | Fewer forks indicating lesser community experimentation. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓Exceptional community interest with 108.6K stars. | Less recognition with 5.1K stars. |
| Unpacked Size | Larger at 2.3 MB, indicating more features. | ✓Minimal at 63.9 kB, easier to ship. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper due to extensive configuration and features. | ✓Gentler, especially for teams familiar with fetch. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Extremely popular with 85.3M downloads per week. | Moderately used with 3.9M downloads. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Heavier at 57.7 kB, potentially impacting performance. | ✓Compact at 37.3 kB, beneficial for quick loading. |
| Project Complexity Fit | ✓Better for complex projects needing comprehensive capabilities. | More suited for simpler projects or straightforward use cases. |