got vs ofetch
Side-by-side comparison of got and ofetch
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.7M
- Stars
- 14.9K
- Gzip Size
- 46.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 5
- Forks
- 975
- Unpacked Size
- 304.1 kB
- Dependencies
- 21
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.9M
- Stars
- 5.1K
- Gzip Size
- 37.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 62
- Forks
- 151
- Unpacked Size
- 63.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
got is designed as a powerful and user-friendly HTTP request library primarily for Node.js environments. It excels in providing a comprehensive feature set for advanced HTTP clients, making it ideal for larger projects or teams that require extensive HTTP capabilities.
In contrast, ofetch offers a more simplified fetch API that operates across Node, browser, and worker contexts. This flexibility makes it a suitable choice for smaller projects or teams familiar with the Fetch API who need a lightweight solution.
While both packages are built on the MIT License and share similar licenses, the higher weekly downloads of got suggest a more established user base, potentially offering better community support. If your project demands extensive features and reliability, got would be the safer choice, whereas for simpler applications or experimentations with varied execution environments, ofetch may be recommended.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | got | ofetch |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Version | ✓14.6.6 | 1.5.1 |
| Categories | HTTP Client | HTTP Client |
| Description | ✓Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js | A better fetch API. Works on node, browser and workers. |
| Open Issues | ✓5, suggesting good maintenance and responsiveness | 62, indicating potential delays in addressing community feedback |
| GitHub Forks | ✓977, reflecting active development | 151, fewer contributors for future collaboration |
| GitHub Stars | ✓14.9K, indicating strong community approval | 5.1K, showing moderate interest |
| Last Updated | 2025-12-30 | ✓2026-02-06 |
| Unpacked Size | 304.1 kB, relatively larger but feature-rich | ✓63.9 kB, lightweight and simpler |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓28.6M, indicating high popularity | 3.9M, showing a growing but smaller user base |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 46.6 kB, moderately sized | ✓37.3 kB, smaller and efficient |