got vs ky
Side-by-side comparison of got and ky
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.7M
- Stars
- 14.9K
- Gzip Size
- 46.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 5
- Forks
- 975
- Unpacked Size
- 304.1 kB
- Dependencies
- 21
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.1M
- Stars
- 16.3K
- Gzip Size
- 5.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 14d ago
- Open Issues
- 31
- Forks
- 449
- Unpacked Size
- 280.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
Both got and ky serve as HTTP clients but cater to different developer needs. Got offers a feature-rich environment suited for complex projects requiring extensive HTTP options and large-scale integrations. In contrast, ky presents a minimalist interface and leverages the Fetch API, making it ideal for lightweight applications and developers looking for simplicity.
If your project emphasizes detailed configuration and extensive features, such as handling numerous request types, got would likely be the better fit. However, for simpler use cases or if you're already utilizing modern JavaScript and Fetch capabilities, ky can streamline your HTTP interactions effectively. Consider your team's familiarity with these approaches as it may influence the integration and efficiency of your work.
While both packages use the MIT license, the potential trade-off with got is its larger size compared to ky, which could impact performance in resource-constrained environments. Additionally, if you plan on using ky, be aware that its API is fundamentally different from traditional Node.js HTTP clients, so migration from got could involve some adjustments in code structure and logic.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | got | ky |
|---|---|---|
| Version | A stable version that supports many features | ✓Latest version focused on elegance and simplicity |
| Use Cases | Perfect for larger applications needing detailed HTTP interactions | Ideal for small to mid-sized projects focusing on speed and simplicity |
| Description | Comprehensive HTTP request capabilities with numerous configuration options | Minimalist design inspired by Fetch API for light requests |
| Open Issues | ✓Very few, reflects solid maintenance and support | More open issues could suggest growing pains or feature requests |
| GitHub Forks | ✓More forks suggesting community customization and contributions | Fewer forks indicating limited community alterations |
| GitHub Stars | Well-recognized, indicating strong community backing | ✓Slightly higher star count, showing appeal for modern projects |
| Last Updated | Earlier update may suggest a mature codebase | ✓More recent update with ongoing development |
| Unpacked Size | Larger size suitable for extensive features | ✓Compact size ideal for smaller applications |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Dominates with high community adoption | Lower but still respectable usage indicating niche popularity |
| Active Development | Stable with fewer changes, reflects maturity | ✓Indicates ongoing feature enhancement and potential for breaking changes |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Larger footprint, reflects richness in features | ✓Minimal at 5.1 kB, highly efficient for quick loads |