ky vs ofetch
Side-by-side comparison of ky and ofetch
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.1M
- Stars
- 16.3K
- Gzip Size
- 5.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 14d ago
- Open Issues
- 31
- Forks
- 449
- Unpacked Size
- 280.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.9M
- Stars
- 5.1K
- Gzip Size
- 37.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 62
- Forks
- 151
- Unpacked Size
- 63.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
ky is a lightweight HTTP client designed for simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for developers needing a straightforward way to make HTTP requests. With a higher number of weekly downloads and a larger user base reflected in its GitHub stars, ky represents a more established option within the JavaScript ecosystem.
ofetch, on the other hand, is positioned as a more versatile fetch API that operates seamlessly across Node.js, browsers, and workers. It is suitable for projects that require flexibility in various environments, although it may be less intuitive for newcomers compared to ky. Given its lower weekly download figures, it may appeal more to specific use cases rather than general usage.
When considering practical recommendations, ky may be the preferred choice for smaller projects or teams with less experience, while ofetch may be better suited for developers familiar with the Fetch API and needing cross-platform support. If your project anticipates growing complexity or requires multi-environment compatibility, ofetch could be more advantageous despite its larger bundle size and lower popularity. Migration from one to the other should be considered carefully due to their differing APIs and configurations.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | ky | ofetch |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | MIT, widely accepted | MIT, same benefits as ky |
| Open Issues | ✓31 ongoing issues may indicate stability | 62 issues suggest a greater need for maintenance |
| GitHub Forks | ✓449 forks indicating active development | 151 forks suggesting less community engagement |
| GitHub Stars | ✓16.3K reflecting high user interest | 5.1K showing moderate popularity |
| Last Updated | Latest updates in 2026 | Recent updates in 2026 |
| Unpacked Size | 280.7 kB, relatively larger | ✓63.9 kB, significantly smaller |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easier for newcomers | Requires more familiarity with Fetch API |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓5.1M indicating strong community usage | 3.9M suggesting a smaller user base |
| Community Support | ✓Stronger community with more resources | Growing but smaller community support |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓5.1 kB, very lightweight | 37.3 kB, larger footprint |
| Overall Positioning | ✓Well-established and simple HTTP client | Versatile fetch API for multiple environments |
| Use Case Suitability | Ideal for simpler applications | ✓Best for multi-platform projects |