ky vs undici
Side-by-side comparison of ky and undici
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.1M
- Stars
- 16.3K
- Gzip Size
- 5.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 14d ago
- Open Issues
- 31
- Forks
- 449
- Unpacked Size
- 280.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 44.8M
- Stars
- 7.4K
- Gzip Size
- 165.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11h ago
- Open Issues
- 326
- Forks
- 701
- Unpacked Size
- 1.5 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
ky is a lightweight HTTP client that is highly suitable for projects where simplicity and minimal setup are key. Its small footprint makes it an excellent choice for browser environments or applications needing straightforward HTTP requests with modern features like Promise support.
In contrast, undici is designed specifically for Node.js, providing performance optimizations for HTTP/1.1 out of the box. It is well-suited for larger applications or systems that require robust performance and can handle the additional complexity of an HTTP client built from scratch. If your project heavily relies on HTTP calls and you need greater control and performance, undici may be the right choice.
Developers should consider the context of their application when choosing between these two clients. While ky excels in simplicity and ease of use, undici's performance benefits are worth the trade-off in size and complexity for server-side use cases.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | ky | undici |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license offers straightforward permissive usage. | Also under MIT, ensuring similar flexibility in usage. |
| Open Issues | ✓31 open issues imply good overall stability with some active development. | 328 open issues suggest more ongoing challenges needing attention. |
| GitHub Forks | 449 forks suggest a decent level of interest in customization for ky. | ✓701 forks indicate a higher level of experimentation and development around undici. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓16.3K stars reflect a strong community and interest in ky. | 7.4K stars indicate a smaller community following for undici. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓280.7 kB is reasonably small, ideal for lightweight applications. | 1.5 MB is significantly larger, suggesting more complexity and features. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Simple and intuitive API, making it easy for new developers. | Requires more time to master due to its extensive capabilities. |
| Current Version | Version 1.14.3 shows active maintenance and steady updates. | ✓Version 7.21.0 indicates ongoing development with new features. |
| Weekly Downloads | 5.1M downloads suggest moderate usage, ideal for smaller projects. | ✓43.8M downloads indicate strong adoption, suitable for larger or more demanding applications. |
| Community Support | ✓Active community with significant engagement around ky. | Growing community, though smaller than ky, with a focus on server optimization. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓5.1 kB is minimal, beneficial for client-side performance. | 165.6 kB is larger, likely due to additional functionalities. |
| Target Environment | Best suited for browser-based projects needing elegant request management. | ✓Optimized for server-side Node.js applications, offering performance improvements. |
| Use Case Suitability | Ideal for projects where minimalism and elegance are needed in HTTP calls. | ✓A better fit for performance-critical applications requiring Node.js integration. |