node-fetch vs undici
Side-by-side comparison of node-fetch and undici
- Weekly Downloads
- 101.7M
- Stars
- 8.9K
- Gzip Size
- 26.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 223
- Forks
- 1.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 107.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 6
- Weekly Downloads
- 44.8M
- Stars
- 7.4K
- Gzip Size
- 165.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11h ago
- Open Issues
- 326
- Forks
- 701
- Unpacked Size
- 1.5 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
node-fetch is a solid choice for developers looking for a lightweight module that closely aligns with the Fetch API standards in Node.js. It serves users who require a straightforward HTTP client with a small footprint and a strong focus on compatibility with existing web standards.
On the other hand, undici is designed specifically for HTTP/1.1 clients and is best suited for applications that need high performance and efficiency in managing numerous requests. If your project is expected to scale or requires advanced handling of HTTP requests, particularly in Node.js environments, undici may be the preferable option.
However, developers should consider the sizes of both packages; node-fetch has a significantly smaller unpacked size and more frequent weekly downloads compared to undici. Because undici has a larger number of open issues, it may indicate a more complex development environment or a need for further stabilization in certain use cases.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | node-fetch | undici |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open-source MIT license | Also under MIT license |
| Open Issues | ✓223 issues may indicate active maintenance | 328 issues could reflect ongoing challenges |
| GitHub Forks | ✓More active development interest with 1.0K forks | Fewer forks at 701 suggests less community contribution |
| GitHub Stars | ✓More preference shown with 8.9K stars | Good engagement with 7.4K stars |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 107.3 kB, promoting faster installations | Larger at 1.5 MB, potentially impacting initial load times |
| Team Experience | ✓Simpler for developers familiar with Fetch API | May require deeper HTTP knowledge for optimal use |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Substantial popularity with 101.4M downloads | Less popular at 43.8M downloads |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Lightweight at 26.6 kB, suitable for quick loads | Heavier at 165.6 kB could slow performance |
| Overall Positioning | Ideal for lightweight, standard-compliant fetch usage | ✓Optimized for high-performance HTTP clients in Node.js |
| Migration Complexity | ✓Easier integration with existing projects | Might require more effort to adapt to its architecture |
| Use Case Suitability | Best for simple fetch tasks | ✓Better for performance-critical applications |