node-fetch vs ofetch
Side-by-side comparison of node-fetch and ofetch
- Weekly Downloads
- 101.7M
- Stars
- 8.9K
- Gzip Size
- 26.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 223
- Forks
- 1.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 107.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 6
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.9M
- Stars
- 5.1K
- Gzip Size
- 37.3 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 62
- Forks
- 151
- Unpacked Size
- 63.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
node-fetch is a solid choice for projects that specifically require Fetch API compatibility in Node.js environments, excelling in usage within backend applications. With its extensive adoption, it boasts a higher number of downloads and a larger community, making it particularly appealing for larger teams or projects looking for widespread support and documentation.
ofetch, while not as widely adopted, offers unique advantages for developers needing a universal solution that works across Node, browsers, and workers. This makes it suitable for multi-environment applications, particularly in modern web development where cross-platform compatibility is crucial. If your project requires lightweight HTTP requests across different contexts, ofetch is a worthy contender.
When considering migration or adoption, teams already familiar with the Fetch API will find node-fetch straightforward to integrate due to its popularity and strong community support. Conversely, teams that prioritize a versatile solution may benefit from exploring ofetch, especially as it may introduce innovative features pertinent to cloud-native and edge computing scenarios.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | node-fetch | ofetch |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license offers flexibility for commercial use | Also licensed under MIT, ensuring equal flexibility |
| Version | ✓Latest release is 3.3.2 | Latest release is 1.5.1 |
| Description | Focuses solely on bringing Fetch API to Node.js | ✓Provides a more universal fetch capability for Node, browsers, and workers |
| Open Issues | Has 223 open issues which may indicate active development but also potential maintenance concerns | ✓Fewer at 62, potentially reflecting a more stable project or slower pace of change |
| GitHub Stars | ✓More generous at 8.9K, suggesting broader interest and engagement | Lower at 5.1K, indicating less community traction |
| Unpacked Size | At 107.3 kB, it is larger and may be less ideal for size-sensitive applications | ✓Smaller at 63.9 kB, making it suitable for performance-critical scenarios |
| Recent Activity | ✓Last updated on 2024-08-13, indicating ongoing maintenance | Last updated in 2026-02-06, suggesting potential stagnation |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Very high at 101.4M, indicating strong community usage | More modest at 3.9M, likely due to narrower scope |
| Community Support | ✓Strong support with many stars and forks, suggesting active contributions | Moderate support with fewer stars and forks, indicating a smaller community |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Compressed size of 26.6 kB is efficient for HTTP requests | Larger at 37.3 kB, which may impact load times in performance-sensitive applications |
| Use Case Flexibility | Best for Node.js specific projects | ✓Highly flexible; works across various environments |