@biomejs/biome vs prettier
Side-by-side comparison of @biomejs/biome and prettier
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.2M
- Stars
- 23.5K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT OR Apache-2.0
- Last Updated
- 1h ago
- Open Issues
- 498
- Forks
- 846
- Unpacked Size
- 628.5 kB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 70.9M
- Stars
- 51.5K
- Gzip Size
- 1.0 MB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 1.4K
- Forks
- 4.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 8.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
@biomejs/biome is a versatile toolchain that caters to a range of web development needs, including formatting and linting. With a focus on static code analysis and support for multiple languages, it positions itself as a handy all-in-one solution for developers looking for a comprehensive toolkit.
In contrast, prettier serves as a strictly opinionated code formatter, prioritizing consistency across various languages including JavaScript and TypeScript. It's well-suited for teams that prioritize code style consistency and want to integrate formatting seamlessly into their development workflow.
Consider using @biomejs/biome for larger, more diverse projects that require multiple tools in one, while prettier could be the better choice for teams focusing on maintaining a uniform code style with less complexity. Transitioning to prettier from an existing formatter may involve a steep adjustment period due to its opinionated nature, whereas @biomejs/biome allows for a more tailored approach that may adapt better to specific project needs.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @biomejs/biome | prettier |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Stars | 23.5K, reflecting a solid user base | ✓51.5K, indicating a strong preference among developers |
| Unpacked Size | ✓628.5 kB, lightweight installation | 8.6 MB, larger due to added breadth of features |
| Language Support | ✓Supports multiple programming paradigms effectively | Specializes heavily in JavaScript and TypeScript formatting |
| Primary Function | ✓Combines formatter and linter for static code analysis | Strictly code formatting |
| Weekly Downloads | 5.2M, indicating steady use | ✓70.8M, showing significant popularity and community trust |
| Open Issues Count | ✓497, suggests active maintenance but some unresolved issues | 1.4K, indicating considerable demand for improvements |
| Version Stability | Frequent updates, latest on 2026-02-07 | Regular updates with latest on 2026-02-06 |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Not specified | 1.0 MB, more substantial compared to other smaller tools |
| Use Case Flexibility | ✓Well-suited for diverse project types and team sizes | Best for teams focused primarily on formatting |
| Team Experience Requirement | May require familiarity with multiple tools and settings | ✓Easy for teams to adopt with straightforward setup |
| Overall Toolchain Versatility | ✓Comprehensive toolchain covering multiple aspects of web development | Focused solely on code formatting |