@biomejs/biome vs eslint
Side-by-side comparison of @biomejs/biome and eslint
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.2M
- Stars
- 23.5K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT OR Apache-2.0
- Last Updated
- 1h ago
- Open Issues
- 498
- Forks
- 846
- Unpacked Size
- 628.5 kB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 90.7M
- Stars
- 26.9K
- Gzip Size
- 431.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 14h ago
- Open Issues
- 92
- Forks
- 4.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.9 MB
- Dependencies
- 47
Download Trends
Verdict
@biomejs/biome offers a comprehensive toolchain that includes a formatter and linter, making it suitable for a wide range of web development tasks. Its robust set of features serves developers looking for an all-in-one solution, particularly in projects that require both coding style enforcement and formatting capabilities.
On the other hand, eslint specializes as an AST-based pattern checker focused on JavaScript linting, making it a go-to tool for teams prioritizing static code analysis to maintain code quality. With significantly higher weekly downloads, eslint is the preferred choice for projects that emphasize JavaScript, especially those involving larger teams or existing codebases with established linting practices.
When considering migration, @biomejs/biome may appeal to developers seeking integrated solutions, but transition costs may arise for teams already committed to eslint's ecosystem and plugins. Additionally, teams should consider the potential learning curve and resource allocation when integrating new tools into their workflows.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @biomejs/biome | eslint |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | 497 open issues indicating room for improvement | ✓Relatively fewer open issues at 90 |
| GitHub Stars | Strong community following with 23.5K stars | ✓Higher community engagement at 26.9K stars |
| Last Updated | Recently updated in February 2026 | Also updated recently in February 2026 |
| Team Adoption | Best for teams needing an integrated approach | ✓Ideal for teams focused on JavaScript lint |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact size at 628.5 kB | Larger footprint at 2.9 MB |
| Learning Curve | Potentially steeper due to varied features | ✓Straightforward for JavaScript-focused teams |
| Overall Purpose | Comprehensive toolchain with formatter and linter for web projects | ✓Focused JavaScript linter based on AST |
| Weekly Downloads | Moderate popularity with 5.2M downloads | ✓Significantly higher demand with 90.5M downloads |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | No data provided for gzip size | ✓Efficient at 431.6 kB |
| License Flexibility | ✓Offers both MIT and Apache-2.0 licenses | Standard MIT license |
| Development Activity | Active development with notable community engagement | ✓Extensive forks indicating broad usage and customization |
| Codebase Compatibility | New tool for teams without established linting processes | ✓Widely adopted in existing JavaScript codebases |