eslint vs oxlint
Side-by-side comparison of eslint and oxlint
- Weekly Downloads
- 90.7M
- Stars
- 26.9K
- Gzip Size
- 431.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 14h ago
- Open Issues
- 92
- Forks
- 4.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.9 MB
- Dependencies
- 47
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.6M
- Stars
- 18.9K
- Gzip Size
- 130.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 12m ago
- Open Issues
- 445
- Forks
- 817
- Unpacked Size
- 4.7 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
eslint is a widely adopted linter for JavaScript, using an AST-based approach to enforce coding standards and practices. It serves a broad audience, from individual developers to large teams, providing extensive customization and a rich plugin ecosystem.
oxlint targets a more niche audience involved in projects using the JavaScript Oxidation Compiler. While it focuses on specific needs such as minification and transpilation, it lacks the same level of community support and extensibility as eslint.
If your project requires strict adherence to JavaScript coding standards, eslint is the clear choice given its popularity and robust feature set. Conversely, oxlint may be suitable for smaller projects utilizing the Oxidation Compiler, but its limited downloads and higher open issue count could indicate potential issues in community support for new users.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | eslint | oxlint |
|---|---|---|
| Version | ✓Current version is 10.0.0, reflecting active development. | Current version is 1.43.0, but fewer updates may raise concerns. |
| Open Issues | ✓90 open issues, which is manageable for a large project. | 429 open issues, possibly signaling more unresolved challenges. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓4.9K forks suggest strong project activity and contributions. | 818 forks, indicating less contribution compared to eslint. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓26.9K stars showcasing extensive popularity. | 18.8K stars, indicating a loyal but smaller following. |
| Last Updated | Recently updated as of 2026-02-07, signaling ongoing maintenance. | Also updated on the same date, ensuring it is current. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓2.9 MB, relatively lightweight for a comprehensive linter. | 4.7 MB, which may be considered bulky for a specialized tool. |
| Customizability | ✓Highly customizable with a rich plugin ecosystem. | Less customizable, targeting specific linter needs. |
| Target Audience | ✓Ideal for general JavaScript projects requiring comprehensive linting. | Specifically aimed at users of the Oxidation Compiler, limiting its appeal. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High at 90.5M, indicating strong community usage. | Lower at 1.6M; may reflect a smaller user base. |
| Ecosystem Support | ✓Strong ecosystem with many resources and tools available. | Limited ecosystem support compared to eslint. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 431.6 kB, reasonable for its feature set, yet not the leanest. | ✓130.4 kB, smaller and possibly better for performance-sensitive contexts. |