COMPARISON · LINTING & FORMATTING

dprint-node vs. oxlint

Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 14 criteria

dprint-node v1.0.8 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
662.8K
Stars
491
Size
24.8 MB (Install Size)
License
MIT
Last Updated
2y ago
Open Issues
13
Forks
9
Unpacked Size
24.8 MB
Dependencies
oxlint v1.68.0 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
3.9M
Stars
21.5K
Size
76 B (Gzip Size)
License
MIT
Last Updated
3mo ago
Open Issues
575
Forks
1.1K
Unpacked Size
1.6 MB
Dependencies
1
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

dprint-node vs oxlint downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for dprint-node and oxlint2 download series from Jun 2025 to May 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.07.1M14.3M21.4M28.5MJun 2025SepDecMarMay 2026
dprint-node
oxlint
FEATURE COMPARISON

Criteria — dprint-node vs oxlint

Core Philosophy
dprint-node
Provides a programmatic API for code formatting, emphasizing control and integration.
oxlint
Offers high-speed, comprehensive code linting with a focus on performance.
Primary Audience
dprint-node
Developers building custom tooling or integrating deep formatting control into Node.js workflows.
oxlint
Developers prioritizing rapid, efficient code quality checks in large projects or CI/CD.
Performance Focus
dprint-node
Robust formatting capabilities, performance is a secondary consideration to API flexibility.
oxlint
Core design principle is maximizing linting speed and minimizing execution time.
Node.js API Access
dprint-node
Provides a direct and extensive Node.js API for deep integration.
oxlint
Primarily a command-line tool; Node.js API integration is not its main design focus.
Size Consideration
dprint-node
Larger unpacked size, indicating comprehensive features or Node.js module overhead.
oxlint
Extremely small unpacked size, indicative of efficient compilation and minimal dependencies.
Extensibility Model
dprint-node
Facilitates sophisticated custom integrations and programmatic control via its Node.js API.
oxlint
Focuses on a broad set of built-in rules, with extensibility centered on rule configuration.
Ecosystem Integration
dprint-node
Integrates well within Node.js environments; part of the broader dprint tooling family.
oxlint
Leverages Rust's performance and can be integrated as a fast binary; less direct Node.js modularity.
Architectural Approach
dprint-node
API-driven design allowing for modularity and programmatic manipulation of formatting.
oxlint
Compiled Rust binary optimized for raw linting speed and efficiency.
Rust-based Optimization
dprint-node
Implemented in TypeScript, leveraging Node.js ecosystem capabilities.
oxlint
Built on Rust for inherent performance benefits and compiled efficiency.
Targeted Use Case - Speed
dprint-node
Offers solid formatting performance, but not its primary differentiating factor.
oxlint
Excels in speed, designed to be one of the fastest available linters.
Targeted Use Case - Tooling
dprint-node
Best suited for building custom code formatters, pre-commit hooks with advanced logic, or code generation tools.
oxlint
Ideal for CI/CD pipelines, large codebase quality checks, and enforcing standards rapidly.
Learning Curve - API Control
dprint-node
Steeper for those unfamiliar with dprint principles or needing deep API immersion.
oxlint
Generally lower for basic linting setup; understanding its full rule set takes time.
Developer Experience - Integration
dprint-node
Direct Node.js API offers straightforward integration for programmatic use cases.
oxlint
Rapid setup for comprehensive linting, ideal for quick adoption in existing projects.
Developer Experience - Customization
dprint-node
High degree of customization possible through its programmable API for formatting logic.
oxlint
Primary customization is through rule enablement/disablement; deeper logic modification less direct.
VERDICT

dprint-node focuses on providing a robust and programmable API for code formatting, primarily targeting developers who need to integrate advanced formatting capabilities directly into their Node.js workflows or build custom tooling around code style enforcement. Its design emphasizes a clear separation between the formatting engine and its application, making it an excellent choice for scenarios requiring deep customization and programmatic control over code appearance.

oxlint, on the other hand, positions itself as an extremely fast linter built with Rust, aiming to provide comprehensive code quality checks with minimal overhead. It is designed for developers who prioritize speed and efficiency, especially in large codebases or performance-critical CI/CD pipelines, offering a broad set of rules out-of-the-box to catch common mistakes and enforce best practices.

A key architectural difference lies in their primary function: dprint-node is fundamentally a formatter with an API, whereas oxlint is a linter that aims for high performance. dprint-node's API allows for programmatic manipulation of code formatting rules and application, suggesting a modular design where different formatters and parsers can be plugged in or extended. oxlint's strength comes from its compiled nature and optimized Rust implementation, delivering linting results at a speed that is often difficult to match with JavaScript-based tools, leveraging a more monolithic and performance-oriented architecture for its linting tasks.

Regarding extension approaches, dprint-node’s API-centric design likely facilitates building custom plugins or integrating with other tools via its programmable interface. This means developers can potentially create sophisticated integrations that go beyond simple formatting, perhaps generating or transforming code based on specific formatting logic. oxlint, while also extensible through its rule-set, focuses more on the breadth and speed of its built-in linting capabilities, with extensibility primarily revolving around enabling or disabling specific linting rules rather than intricate programmatic control over the linting process itself.

From a developer experience perspective, dprint-node offers a clear path for those comfortable with Node.js APIs, providing direct control for integration. The learning curve might be gentler for developers already familiar with dprint's core principles and looking to leverage its programmatic features. oxlint, with its emphasis on speed and a wide array of default rules, aims for a quick setup for common linting needs. Developers can expect to get comprehensive checks running very rapidly, though deep customization might require understanding its specific rule configuration and potentially its underlying Rust-based mechanics if advanced extensions are ever needed.

Performance and size are significant differentiators. oxlint boasts an extremely small bundle size and rapid execution, making it an attractive option for environments where resource consumption and build times are paramount. Its Rust foundation contributes to this efficiency, allowing it to perform a large number of checks very quickly. dprint-node, while robust, has a considerably larger unpacked size, suggesting a more feature-rich or perhaps less optimized distribution for direct Node.js API use, which might be a consideration for extremely constrained environments or when absolute minimal footprint is a strict requirement.

For practical recommendations, consider dprint-node when your primary goal is to embed sophisticated code formatting within a Node.js application or build custom code styling tools, especially if you require fine-grained programmatic control over formatting rules. It’s ideal for internal tooling, pre-commit hooks with custom logic, or projects where consistent code appearance is managed via an API. On the other hand, choose oxlint when the highest priority is extremely fast, comprehensive linting across a large codebase, particularly in CI/CD pipelines where performance directly impacts developer workflow and build times. Its speed and extensive rule set make it excellent for catching a wide array of potential issues rapidly.

Regarding ecosystem and maintenance, dprint-node is part of the dprint ecosystem, suggesting potential benefits if you are already invested in or familiar with dprint's broader tooling. The API approach facilitates integration and potential interoperability within this ecosystem. oxlint's rapid release cycle and clear focus on performance indicate a project actively pursuing cutting-edge speed and linting capabilities. Its popularity suggests strong community interest and potential for ongoing development, though its rust-based core means contributions and extensions might lean towards systems programming expertise.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

RELATED COMPARISONS 6
dprint-node vs prettier ★ 52.4K · 54.8M/wk dprint-node vs eslint ★ 27.8K · 68.0M/wk @biomejs/biome vs dprint-node ★ 25.4K · 5.1M/wk oxlint vs prettier ★ 73.4K · 58.0M/wk @biomejs/biome vs oxlint ★ 46.3K · 8.4M/wk eslint vs oxlint ★ 48.7K · 71.3M/wk