@pandacss/dev vs bootstrap
Side-by-side comparison of @pandacss/dev and bootstrap
- Weekly Downloads
- 199.2K
- Stars
- 6.0K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11m ago
- Open Issues
- 8
- Forks
- 284
- Unpacked Size
- 851.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.4M
- Stars
- 174.0K
- Gzip Size
- 24.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 13h ago
- Open Issues
- 571
- Forks
- 79.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 9.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
@pandacss/dev is a specialized tool focused on enabling atomic CSS styling and design systems, making it ideal for teams prioritizing custom design tokens and theming. In contrast, bootstrap serves as an extensive front-end framework suitable for developing responsive and mobile-first web applications, making it widely adopted for general web development projects.
For smaller projects or teams with a strong understanding of design systems, @pandacss/dev offers a more tailored approach and quicker setup. However, for larger applications where a comprehensive framework is beneficial, bootstrap's wide array of pre-built components and extensive documentation may provide better long-term support. Additionally, those familiar with traditional CSS frameworks may find the transition to using @pandacss/dev requires more adjustment in mindset and workflow, especially when compared to the more conventional syntax of bootstrap.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @pandacss/dev | bootstrap |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license provides flexibility for usage and modification. | MIT license also allows for wide usage; both packages are equal here. |
| Open Issues | ✓9 open issues suggest active maintenance and responsiveness to user feedback. | 572 open issues may indicate a more complex codebase, but also a larger community engaged in troubleshooting. |
| GitHub Stars | 6.0K stars signify a solid interest among developers. | ✓174.0K stars reflect immense popularity and trust in the community. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓851.9 kB size is optimal for projects needing minimal bloat. | 9.6 MB size may introduce unnecessary overhead for lightweight applications. |
| Scope of Usage | Best for projects focusing on design tokens and custom styles. | ✓Effective for a wide range of projects from simple to complex web applications. |
| Team Experience | Ideal for teams experienced with atomic CSS and custom theming. | ✓Suitable for teams accustomed to traditional CSS frameworks and looking for quick setup. |
| Weekly Downloads | 196.1K downloads indicate a growing but niche user base. | ✓5.4M downloads demonstrate strong popularity and community support. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓3.5 kB provides a very minimal footprint, benefiting performance. | 24.9 kB is larger but acceptable for a complete framework. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Strong TypeScript support aligns with modern development practices. | Bootstrap also supports TypeScript, but may not be as tightly integrated. |
| Overall Positioning | Focused on design systems and atomic CSS for custom styling. | ✓Comprehensive and popular framework for responsive, mobile-first design. |
| Framework Agnosticism | ✓Framework-agnostic in its approach, provides flexibility in usage. | Primarily tied to its own assumptions about usage patterns. |
| Community and Ecosystem | Niche but growing community around atomic CSS. | ✓Vast community and numerous resources available for bootstrap. |