@pandacss/dev vs styled-components
Side-by-side comparison of @pandacss/dev and styled-components
- Weekly Downloads
- 199.2K
- Stars
- 6.0K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11m ago
- Open Issues
- 8
- Forks
- 284
- Unpacked Size
- 851.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
- Weekly Downloads
- 8.1M
- Stars
- 41.0K
- Gzip Size
- 19.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 17h ago
- Open Issues
- 336
- Forks
- 2.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 1.8 MB
- Dependencies
- 7
Download Trends
Verdict
@pandacss/dev is tailored for projects emphasizing a design system approach with a focus on atomic CSS and design tokens. It serves teams who prioritize a lightweight solution, particularly for those looking for a framework-agnostic tool that integrates smoothly with existing workflows, especially with a TypeScript focus.
In contrast, styled-components is designed for a component-driven architecture commonly found in React applications. Its strong typing and flexibility make it ideal for larger teams or projects needing granular control over styles within components. If you have a React-centric project or appreciate extensive community support, styled-components will likely serve you better.
Consider your team's familiarity with CSS-in-JS paradigms, as migrating from one library to another can involve comprehensive adjustments in coding practices. Additionally, the larger bundle size of styled-components could impact load times in contrast to the minimal footprint of @pandacss/dev, which may appeal to performance-oriented developers.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @pandacss/dev | styled-components |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓With 8 open issues, @pandacss/dev has a manageable level of maintenance. | 336 open issues could indicate more active development or challenges. |
| GitHub Stars | 6.0K stars reflect a growing interest. | ✓41.0K stars suggest robust community engagement. |
| Project Focus | Best for design and theming-focused projects. | ✓Specialized for component-based styling approaches. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓At 851.9 kB, it remains lightweight for clients. | 1.8 MB size may be considerable for users focused on performance. |
| Learning Curve | Less known, may require more onboarding if using atomic CSS. | ✓Widely used in the React community, easier for new developers. |
| Topics Covered | ✓Covers a broader set of topics, focusing on design systems. | Geared specifically towards styled-components and React. |
| Weekly Downloads | 199.2K downloads showing moderate usage. | ✓8.1M downloads indicate wide adoption and community support. |
| Community Support | Gaining traction but smaller community compared to styled-components. | ✓Active and extensive community resources available. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 3.5 kB, suitable for performance. | Larger at 19.8 kB, which may affect load times. |
| TypeScript Support | Strong TypeScript support which appeals to modern development practices. | Solid TypeScript compatibility in React applications. |
| Overall Positioning | Best for design systems and atomic CSS approach. | ✓Ideal for component-based styling in React applications. |