bulma vs tailwindcss

Side-by-side comparison of bulma and tailwindcss

bulma v1.0.4 MIT
Weekly Downloads
231.7K
Stars
50.1K
Gzip Size
173 B
License
MIT
Last Updated
12d ago
Open Issues
517
Forks
3.9K
Unpacked Size
7.0 MB
Dependencies
1
tailwindcss v4.1.18 MIT
Weekly Downloads
53.4M
Stars
93.4K
Gzip Size
69.0 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
20h ago
Open Issues
75
Forks
5.0K
Unpacked Size
748.8 kB
Dependencies
1

Download Trends

Download trends for bulma and tailwindcss040.9M81.8M122.6M163.5MFeb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26
bulma
tailwindcss

Verdict

bulma is a modern CSS framework that prioritizes simplicity and a straightforward approach to layout design using Flexbox. It is well-suited for projects that seek to implement a clean and consistent design without a steep learning curve. In contrast, tailwindcss is a utility-first CSS framework that allows for rapid development of custom user interfaces, making it ideal for teams looking to build highly customized styles quickly.

When selecting between the two, consider the nature of your project and team experience. For smaller projects or teams with limited CSS experience, bulma provides an easy entry point with its predefined components. On the other hand, tailwindcss caters to more complex applications that require a more modular and customizable styling approach, which can be particularly beneficial for larger teams proficient in utility-based frameworks.

Transitioning from bulma to tailwindcss may require a shift in design philosophy, as tailwindcss encourages a more hands-on approach to styling through utility classes. Additionally, while bulma's bundle size is minimal, tailwindcss offers a more extensive set of tools at a compatible size, which can impact your project based on its specific requirements.

Detailed Comparison

Criteria bulma tailwindcss
Open Issues Many open issues may imply slower maintenance. Fewer open issues suggest more active support.
GitHub Forks Moderate forks indicate some level of community collaboration. Higher forks suggest extensive community-driven development.
GitHub Stars Significant stars but less than its competitor. More stars indicate a larger community and interest.
Last Updated More than a decade old with last update noted in 2026. Relatively newer with consistent updates.
Use Case Fit Suitable for simpler, static pages. Excels in dynamic applications needing tailored styling.
Unpacked Size Fairly lightweight at 7.0 MB. More compact at 748.8 kB, benefiting smaller projects.
Learning Curve Easier for newcomers with a straightforward structure. More challenging, requiring understanding of utility-first design.
Weekly Downloads Low downloads indicate niche use. High downloads suggest popularity and community support.
Bundle Size (gzip) Very small at 173 B, suitable for performance. Also small at 69.0 kB, facilitating fast load times.
Overall Positioning Best for straightforward design using Flexbox. Ideal for rapid UI development with utility classes.
Customization Options Limited customization without overriding styles. Highly customizable through extensive utility classes.

Related Comparisons