bulma vs sass
Side-by-side comparison of bulma and sass
- Weekly Downloads
- 231.7K
- Stars
- 50.1K
- Gzip Size
- 173 B
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 12d ago
- Open Issues
- 517
- Forks
- 3.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 7.0 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 22.8M
- Stars
- 4.2K
- Gzip Size
- 704.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3d ago
- Open Issues
- 67
- Forks
- 376
- Unpacked Size
- 5.9 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
Bulma is tailored for developers looking for a modern CSS framework that simplifies responsive design with Flexbox. It's ideal for projects focusing on rapid UI development with a clean and minimal styling approach.
Sass, on the other hand, serves as a powerful CSS preprocessor, enabling developers to write more maintainable and scalable stylesheets. It is particularly suitable for larger projects where modularity and advanced features, such as variables and mixins, can significantly enhance productivity and code clarity.
While Bulma is straightforward for responsive design, Sass offers more flexibility in CSS authoring. The choice between them largely depends on whether your team prioritizes rapid UI prototyping with Bulma or advanced CSS capabilities through Sass, especially in larger codebases.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | bulma | sass |
|---|---|---|
| Flexibility | Less flexible as it focuses on predefined styles. | ✓Highly flexible, allowing for advanced CSS techniques. |
| Open Issues | 517 open issues suggest ongoing development needs. | ✓67 open issues indicate a more stable state. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓50.1K stars, reflecting significant community interest and support. | 4.2K stars, which is lower but still showcases a dedicated user base. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2026-01-26, suggesting regular maintenance. | ✓Last updated on 2026-02-05, showing recent activity. |
| Unpacked Size | 7.0 MB, relatively larger and may impact load times. | ✓5.9 MB is more compact for distribution. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Low learning curve, quick adoption for new users. | Moderate learning curve, requires understanding of CSS preprocessing concepts. |
| Team Experience | ✓Suitable for teams with diverse skill levels. | Better for experienced developers familiar with preprocessors. |
| Project Use Case | Best for quick UI implementation with minimal setup. | ✓Ideal for projects requiring complex styles and structure. |
| Weekly Downloads | 231.1K downloads indicating a solid usage base. | ✓22.8M downloads highlighting its popularity and widespread use. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓173 B is minimal and enhances loading times. | 704.9 kB is larger but offers more features. |
| Overall Positioning | Ideal for responsive design with a focus on ease of use. | ✓Best for advanced CSS authoring and maintainability. |