@emotion/react vs sass
Side-by-side comparison of @emotion/react and sass
- Weekly Downloads
- 14.2M
- Stars
- 18.0K
- Gzip Size
- 12.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3mo ago
- Open Issues
- 367
- Forks
- 1.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 816.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 15
- Weekly Downloads
- 22.8M
- Stars
- 4.2K
- Gzip Size
- 704.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3d ago
- Open Issues
- 67
- Forks
- 376
- Unpacked Size
- 5.9 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
@emotion/react excels in enabling simple styling within React applications, making it highly suitable for projects focusing on CSS-in-JS solutions. It caters particularly well to teams working extensively with React, offering a modern approach to styling that integrates seamlessly with React's component-based architecture.
On the other hand, sass offers a complete Sass implementation as a pure JavaScript solution, catering to a broader audience that includes teams familiar with traditional CSS preprocessing. It’s particularly useful for larger projects where a more structured CSS architecture is required, as it provides rich features like variables, nesting, and mixins.
When choosing between the two, consider the application's needs: use @emotion/react for React-centric projects needing straightforward styling solutions, while sass is better for complex CSS architectures. Migrating from one to the other may involve reworking styles; hence, the choice should align with long-term project goals and team expertise.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @emotion/react | sass |
|---|---|---|
| Use Case | Best for React projects where styling needs to match components. | ✓Ideal for traditional web projects and larger applications with complex styles. |
| Licensing | Both are MIT licensed, promoting open-source collaboration. | Same as @emotion/react, thus this criterion is a tie. |
| Bundle Size | ✓Minimal at 12.1 kB gzip, enhancing quick load times. | 704.9 kB is significantly larger, affecting performance more heavily. |
| Open Issues | 367, indicating potential areas for improvement. | ✓67, generally well-maintained with fewer open concerns. |
| Performance | ✓Optimized for React, allows for dynamic styling. | Performance depends on the project size, can lead to larger final CSS files. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓18.0K stars reflect a strong community around React styling. | 4.2K stars suggest a smaller, but dedicated user base. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓816.8 kB makes it lightweight for React applications. | 5.9 MB signifies more overhead, but includes comprehensive features. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Relatively easy for developers familiar with React. | Requires understanding of Sass features which might present a steeper curve. |
| Weekly Downloads | 14.2M, indicative of strong React community usage. | ✓22.8M, showing more extensive usage across the web. |
| Community Support | ✓Strong support in the React ecosystem. | Maintained by a dedicated community with fewer issues. |
| Overall Positioning | Focused on React styling with a CSS-in-JS approach. | ✓A broad CSS preprocessor suitable for various applications. |