@emotion/react vs bootstrap
Side-by-side comparison of @emotion/react and bootstrap
- Weekly Downloads
- 14.2M
- Stars
- 18.0K
- Gzip Size
- 12.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3mo ago
- Open Issues
- 367
- Forks
- 1.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 816.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 15
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.4M
- Stars
- 174.0K
- Gzip Size
- 24.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 13h ago
- Open Issues
- 571
- Forks
- 79.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 9.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
@emotion/react is designed specifically for styling React applications with a focus on performance and ease of use, making it ideal for developers looking for a lightweight solution that integrates seamlessly with React components. Bootstrap, on the other hand, serves as a comprehensive front-end framework, offering extensive components and utilities for building responsive web projects, appealing to teams that require a more standardized and feature-rich approach across various web technologies.
For smaller projects where team familiarity with React is high, @emotion/react would be a strong choice due to its simplicity and low footprint. Conversely, for larger, multi-page applications that demand responsiveness and a consistent user interface, Bootstrap's vast library of pre-designed components can help speed up development and maintain design uniformity, especially for teams experienced with CSS and HTML.
Developers should note that migrating from Bootstrap to @emotion/react could involve a significant shift in styling methodology from CSS classes to a JavaScript-based approach, which might require additional time for learning. Additionally, while @emotion/react provides a lightweight bundle, Bootstrap’s larger size includes more built-in functionalities that could be advantageous for larger projects but may lead to unnecessarily heavy applications if not all included features are used.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @emotion/react | bootstrap |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓367 open issues show a manageable level of active development challenges. | 572 open issues present a more complex environment for contributors. |
| GitHub Forks | 1.1K forks indicate moderate interest in customization. | ✓Large number of 79.1K forks demonstrates extensive community engagement. |
| GitHub Stars | 18.0K stars reflects a solid community and ongoing interest. | ✓Significantly higher with 174.0K stars, showing a broader appeal. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 816.8 kB, making it efficient for project builds. | Significantly larger at 9.6 MB, offering more functionalities but potentially excessive. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Straightforward for React developers, low barrier to entry. | More complex due to its wide range of components and utilities. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High popularity at 14.2M weekly downloads indicating strong community adoption. | 5.4M downloads show solid usage but less than @emotion/react. |
| Support for React | ✓Optimized specifically for use with React applications. | General framework applicable to various technologies, but not React-centric. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 12.1 kB, supporting rapid load times. | Larger at 24.9 kB, which may affect initial load performance. |
| Overall Positioning | Tailored for React styling with a focus on performance. | ✓Comprehensive framework for responsive web development. |
| Use Case Recommendation | Best for small to medium projects focused on React. | ✓Ideal for large-scale responsive applications across various platforms. |
| Customization Flexibility | ✓Highly customizable through JavaScript and CSS-in-JS. | Customization possible but often relies on predefined classes and utilities. |