busboy vs formidable
Side-by-side comparison of busboy and formidable
- Weekly Downloads
- 23.0M
- Stars
- 3.0K
- Gzip Size
- 6.0 kB
- License
- —
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 38
- Forks
- 219
- Unpacked Size
- 124.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
- Weekly Downloads
- 16.0M
- Stars
- —
- Gzip Size
- 12.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- —
- Open Issues
- —
- Forks
- —
- Unpacked Size
- 203.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
busboy is a lightweight streaming parser aimed at handling HTML form data efficiently in a node.js environment. With its focus on minimalism and performance, it serves developers looking for a straightforward solution for file uploads with a high volume of weekly downloads, indicating strong community backing.
In contrast, formidable is designed for parsing form data, especially tailored for file uploads, making it suitable for projects requiring more robust handling of multipart form data. It may be the preferred choice for teams working with larger applications or those requiring more comprehensive features, given its larger unpacked size and additional capabilities.
When considering migration, developers should weigh busboy's lower bundle size and simplicity against formidable's broader feature set. If the project is lightweight and performance-centric, busboy may be the better fit, while formidable could serve those needing more extensive parsing capabilities or who are working on larger codebases.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | busboy | formidable |
|---|---|---|
| License | License information not specified. | ✓MIT License allows for broad use. |
| Version | ✓Up-to-date with version 1.6.0. | Slightly older version 3.5.4. |
| Categories | Categorized under File Upload, focusing on streamlining uploads. | Also under File Upload, suited for multipart form data. |
| Description | Specializes in streaming HTML form data parsing. | Focuses on comprehensive form data parsing including file uploads. |
| Open Issues | 38 open issues, indicating ongoing maintenance challenges. | No information provided on open issues. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓Impressive 3.0K stars, showcasing popularity. | Lower at an unspecified amount, but still relevant. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Minimal at 124.4 kB, efficient for smaller applications. | Larger at 203.8 kB, potentially heavier for lightweight scenarios. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Higher at 22.2M, indicating strong usage. | Lower at 16.0M, but still significant. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Smaller at 6.0 kB, leading to faster load times. | Larger at 12.0 kB, which may slow loading slightly. |