formidable vs uploadthing
Side-by-side comparison of formidable and uploadthing
- Weekly Downloads
- 16.0M
- Stars
- —
- Gzip Size
- 12.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- —
- Open Issues
- —
- Forks
- —
- Unpacked Size
- 203.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
- Weekly Downloads
- 97.4K
- Stars
- 5.0K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 46
- Forks
- 407
- Unpacked Size
- 588.6 kB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
formidable is a well-established module for parsing form data, particularly for file uploads, serving projects that prioritize a lightweight solution. In contrast, uploadthing appears to be a more feature-rich option, indicated by its broader documentation and maintained repository.
For projects requiring efficient file upload handling without extensive overhead, formidable is a solid choice due to its smaller bundle size and high weekly downloads. However, if your team values integration with modern features and extensive documentation, uploadthing may be more suitable despite its larger size and fewer downloads.
Consider the project scope when selecting between the two; formidable is ideal for applications needing swift implementations, while uploadthing could offer more flexibility for longer-term projects that can handle its larger footprint.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | formidable | uploadthing |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license, promoting open-source collaboration. | MIT license, ensuring equal benefits. |
| Version | Older version, reflecting more stability in its niche. | ✓More recent version suggests active development. |
| Use Cases | Ideal for applications needing straightforward file uploads. | Suitable for projects looking for advanced features. |
| Description | Specializes in parsing form data and file uploads. | Offers comprehensive documentation and additional features. |
| Open Issues | ✓Not applicable, possibly stable and mature. | 45 open issues, indicating active development and ongoing work. |
| GitHub Forks | Not provided, possibly indicating less experimentation. | ✓406 forks, suggesting interactive community involvement. |
| GitHub Stars | Not provided, but likely fewer due to age. | ✓5.0K stars indicating developer interest. |
| Last Updated | Not specified, likely older due to stability. | ✓Recently updated on 2026-01-23, showing active maintenance. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 203.8 kB, minimizing application size. | Larger at 588.6 kB, potentially impacting load times. |
| Team Experience | Good for teams familiar with legacy parsing methods. | Better for teams adapting to modern frameworks. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High popularity with 16.0M weekly downloads. | Lower popularity at 95.6K weekly downloads. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 12.0 kB, efficient for production. | Not specified, potential for larger size impacts. |