@nivo/core vs chart.js
Side-by-side comparison of @nivo/core and chart.js
- Weekly Downloads
- 989.1K
- Stars
- 14.0K
- Gzip Size
- 69.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 54
- Forks
- 1.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 254.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 30
- Weekly Downloads
- 6.8M
- Stars
- 67.1K
- Gzip Size
- 71.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 525
- Forks
- 12.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 6.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
Both @nivo/core and chart.js serve the charts and data visualization needs, but they cater to different audiences. @nivo/core stands out with a focus on React components, well-suited for developers looking to create complex visualizations with an emphasis on data interactivity. In contrast, chart.js offers a straightforward solution for rendering simple HTML5 charts across various platforms, making it ideal for those who need quick implementations without extensive customization.
When deciding which to use, consider the size of your project and the expertise of your team. If your team is experienced with React and you require intricate data visualizations, @nivo/core may be the preferable choice due to its rich feature set. On the other hand, for simpler charting needs or if your project requires HTML5 canvas support without the overhead of React, chart.js is a more suitable option.
The size difference and installation footprint between the two can influence selection as well. With @nivo/core having a much smaller unpacked size compared to chart.js, it may be more appealing for projects concerned with performance and efficiency, especially in web environments where load times are critical.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @nivo/core | chart.js |
|---|---|---|
| License | Uses MIT License, permissive and popular | Also uses MIT License, ensuring compatibility |
| Version | Unchanged at 0.99.0, indicating active development | ✓Latest stable release at 4.5.1 |
| Ease of Use | Requires React knowledge, may have a steeper learning curve | ✓User-friendly for most developers, easy to get started |
| Open Issues | ✓54 open issues representing manageable backlog | 525 open issues suggesting a larger scope for improvements |
| GitHub Forks | 1.1K forks, showing some community involvement | ✓12.0K forks, indicating extensive community contributions |
| GitHub Stars | 14.0K stars reflecting community interest | ✓67.1K stars showcasing strong popularity |
| Unpacked Size | ✓254.4 kB, making it lightweight for React applications | 6.2 MB, considerably larger due to its feature set |
| Weekly Downloads | 987.0K downloads, indicating solid usage | ✓6.8M downloads, significantly more widely adopted |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Not provided, but likely larger due to features | ✓71.4 kB, relatively small size |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Supports TypeScript natively, suitable for typed projects | Official TypeScript support available, but not as thorough |
| Customization Flexibility | ✓Highly customizable for complex visualizations using D3 | Good for simple charts but limited in complex scenarios |