@nivo/core vs @visx/visx
Side-by-side comparison of @nivo/core and @visx/visx
- Weekly Downloads
- 989.1K
- Stars
- 14.0K
- Gzip Size
- 69.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 54
- Forks
- 1.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 254.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 30
- Weekly Downloads
- 77.4K
- Stars
- 20.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 147
- Forks
- 755
- Unpacked Size
- 12.3 kB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
@nivo/core focuses on offering comprehensive charting capabilities with a strong emphasis on data visualization components. It serves developers who need a robust set of features for complex data presentations, particularly those utilizing React and D3.js.
In contrast, @visx/visx provides a modular approach, making it ideal for projects that require a lightweight solution without sacrificing flexibility. Developers who are experienced with D3 may find @visx/visx particularly appealing, as it allows for finer control over visualizations while minimizing bundle size.
When considering trade-offs, @nivo/core has a larger unpacked size and more weekly downloads, indicating a broader adoption and potentially more community support. However, @visx/visx's smaller footprint makes it a compelling option for projects where performance and quick loading times are priorities.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @nivo/core | @visx/visx |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | Unpacked size of 254.4 kB, relatively large. | ✓Very small at 12.3 kB, offers better performance in lightweight applications. |
| Open Issues | ✓54 open issues suggest active maintenance and updates. | 147 open issues could indicate challenges in stability or support. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓1.1K forks show solid development interest. | 755 forks indicate less active modification by users. |
| GitHub Stars | 14.0K stars reflect good community interest. | ✓20.6K stars indicate higher popularity among users. |
| Last Updated | ✓Most recent update on 2025-12-08, indicating ongoing development. | Updated on 2025-11-11, a little behind @nivo/core. |
| Use Case Fit | ✓Ideal for applications requiring complex data visualizations. | Best for projects needing lightweight, custom visual solutions. |
| Overall Focus | ✓Best for comprehensive charting with rich features. | Great for modular and flexible visualization needs. |
| Learning Curve | Moderate, due to its rich features and component structure. | ✓Potentially lower for developers familiar with D3, but may require internal knowledge. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Significantly higher at 987.0K, indicating wider adoption. | Lower at 77.6K, which suggests a smaller user base. |
| Community Support | ✓Strong community due to high downloads and forks. | Smaller community may limit third-party support. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Full TypeScript support available, enhancing developer experience. | Supports TypeScript, but resources may be less comprehensive than @nivo/core. |
| Integration Flexibility | Works seamlessly with various data formats and ecosystems. | ✓Modularity allows for tailored implementations based on project needs. |