@clerk/nextjs vs lucia
Side-by-side comparison of @clerk/nextjs and lucia
- Weekly Downloads
- 672.6K
- Stars
- 1.7K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 37m ago
- Open Issues
- 78
- Forks
- 434
- Unpacked Size
- 1.0 MB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 100.6K
- Stars
- 10.4K
- Gzip Size
- 4.2 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6mo ago
- Open Issues
- 22
- Forks
- 527
- Unpacked Size
- 46.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
@clerk/nextjs is tailored for developers building applications with Next.js, offering a comprehensive suite for authentication needs. Its strong focus on modern frameworks and established integration options makes it a solid choice for larger projects requiring robust auth solutions.
On the other hand, lucia is a lightweight and flexible authentication library that appeals to developers looking for simplicity and performance. Ideal for smaller applications or those who prioritize minimal overhead, lucia is easier to set up and can be adapted across different tech stacks without significant complexity.
When considering migration, developers should note that @clerk/nextjs comes with more dependencies and potential overhead due to its comprehensive feature set. In contrast, switching to lucia would mean adopting a more minimalistic approach, which could benefit projects with fewer requirements but may lack advanced features found in @clerk/nextjs.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @clerk/nextjs | lucia |
|---|---|---|
| License | Both are under the MIT license, allowing for flexibility in usage. | Same as @clerk/nextjs, providing freedom for developers. |
| Open Issues | 79 open issues suggest active development but some unresolved concerns. | ✓With only 22 open issues, lucia appears to be more stable. |
| GitHub Stars | Strong community support with 1.7K stars. | ✓Very popular with 10.4K stars indicating a large user base. |
| Last Updated | ✓Last updated on 2026-02-07, indicating ongoing support. | Last updated on 2025-07-13, showing consistent maintenance. |
| Unpacked Size | 1.0 MB, larger due to its extensive features. | ✓Much smaller at 46.0 kB, ideal for lightweight applications. |
| Learning Curve | May require more time to understand due to its feature richness. | ✓Simpler to learn and implement, beneficial for quick setups. |
| Team Experience | Best for teams with Next.js experience and looking for in-depth auth features. | ✓Suitable for teams needing a straightforward solution with varied experience. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High interest at 666.0K weekly downloads. | More modest at 98.4K weekly downloads. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Bundle size information not provided, but likely larger. | ✓Extremely small at 4.2 kB, reducing load times significantly. |
| Overall Positioning | Focused on Next.js for comprehensive authentication solutions. | ✓Lightweight and flexible for broader tech stacks. |
| Integration Flexibility | Strongly integrated with Next.js framework. | ✓Flexible for use with various frameworks and setups. |