date-fns vs moment
Side-by-side comparison of date-fns and moment
- Weekly Downloads
- 45.8M
- Stars
- 36.5K
- Gzip Size
- 18.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 906
- Forks
- 1.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 22.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.2M
- Stars
- 48.1K
- Gzip Size
- 20.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 290
- Forks
- 7.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.4 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
date-fns offers a modern approach to date manipulation with a modular design that appeals to developers looking for a lightweight library with extensive utilities. In contrast, moment is a more established library that provides a comprehensive set of features for date parsing, validation, and manipulation, catering well to developers familiar with its API and existing projects.
For new projects, especially those aiming for performance and simplicity, date-fns is a strong choice due to its smaller bundle size and modular functionality. However, if your project involves complex date operations or requires extensive localization features, moment may be more suitable, especially if your team has existing experience with it.
It is worth noting that date-fns encourages a more functional programming style, which might require a shift in mindset from those accustomed to moment's object-oriented approach. While moving to date-fns from moment is feasible, developers should account for potential rewrites due to API differences.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | date-fns | moment |
|---|---|---|
| License | Both libraries are MIT licensed with no restrictions | Same license providing flexibility for use |
| Version | ✓Modern version indicating active development | Older version, but still maintained |
| Modularity | ✓Modular design allows for selective importing | Monolithic design can include unnecessary components |
| Open Issues | 906 issues suggest ongoing development focus | ✓290 issues show a more stable state |
| GitHub Forks | 1.9K forks suggest healthy community contributions | ✓7.0K forks indicating wide adoption for modifications |
| GitHub Stars | 36.4K stars reflect strong community support | ✓48.1K stars showing a loyal following |
| Unpacked Size | 22.6 MB, larger but includes more utilities | ✓4.4 MB, significantly lighter and easier to integrate |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Significantly higher at 46.0M, indicating popularity | 28.1M downloads show substantial usage |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Compressed to 18.6 kB, efficient for small projects | 20.4 kB, slightly larger but still manageable |
| Community and Support | Growing community backing, but newer | ✓Established community with extensive resources and plugins |
| Date Manipulation Features | Focused utilities making it suitable for straightforward tasks | ✓Comprehensive manipulation capabilities for complex requirements |