COMPARISON · DATE & TIME

dayjs vs. moment

Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 14 criteria

dayjs v1.11.23 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
71.3M
Stars
48.7K
Gzip Size
3.4 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
11mo ago
Open Issues
1.4K
Forks
3.8K
Unpacked Size
681.7 kB
Dependencies
1
moment v2.31.0 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
35.0M
Stars
47.9K
Gzip Size
20.8 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
11mo ago
Open Issues
70
Forks
7.0K
Unpacked Size
4.5 MB
Dependencies
1
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

dayjs vs moment downloads · last 12 months

Download trends for dayjs and moment2 download series from Oct 2025 to Sep 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.073.6M147.2M220.8M294.4MOct 2025JanAprJulSep 2026
dayjs
moment
FEATURE COMPARISON

Criteria · dayjs vs moment

Modernity
dayjs ✓
Designed with modern JavaScript practices and performance in mind.
moment
A mature library with a long history, adapted over time but not fundamentally modern in design.
Bundle Size
dayjs ✓
Extremely minimal at 3.4 kB (gzip), ideal for performance-sensitive applications.
moment
Considerably larger at 20.8 kB (gzip), suitable for projects where size is less critical.
Immutability
dayjs ✓
Day.js operates with immutable data structures by default, preventing unintended side effects.
moment
Moment.js is mutable by default, requiring developers to be mindful of state changes.
Learning Curve
dayjs ✓
Gentle learning curve, especially for developers familiar with Moment.js syntax.
moment
Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and mutable nature.
API Familiarity
dayjs ✓
Offers an API very similar to Moment.js, easing transition for existing users.
moment
The established and extensive API is well-known but can be more verbose.
Core Philosophy
dayjs ✓
Day.js prioritizes a small footprint and a modern, familiar API for efficiency.
moment
Moment.js offers a comprehensive, feature-rich, and battle-tested solution for complex date needs.
Data Flow Design
dayjs ✓
Strictly immutable data flow ensures predictable outcomes and easier debugging.
moment
Mutable data flow requires careful management to avoid unintended state modifications.
Dependency Count
dayjs ✓
Has zero external dependencies, contributing to its small size.
moment
While self-contained, its size suggests internal complexity beyond minimal dependencies.
Memory Footprint
dayjs ✓
Low memory usage attributed to its small size and immutable design.
moment
Higher memory usage due to its larger size and more complex internal structures.
Plugin Granularity
dayjs ✓
Highly granular plugins allow precise control over included functionality.
moment
Plugins are available but the core library is already substantial.
TypeScript Support
dayjs ✓
Excellent built-in TypeScript support, enhancing developer confidence.
moment
Good TypeScript support, though potentially more verbose due to API.
Extensibility Model
dayjs ✓
Uses a plugin system for modularity, allowing developers to include only needed features.
moment
Features are largely built into the core, with an option for further extension via plugins.
Maturity vs. Innovation
dayjs
Represents a more innovative approach focusing on modern needs like performance.
moment
Represents deep maturity and extensive historical usage, with stability as a key asset.
Legacy Project Suitability
dayjs
Can be adopted in legacy projects, but requires careful handling of immutability differences.
moment ✓
A natural fit for legacy projects already integrated with its API and ecosystem.
VERDICT

Day.js is designed for developers seeking a lightweight, immutable, and modern alternative to Moment.js. Its core philosophy revolves around a minimal footprint and a familiar API, making it ideal for front-end applications where bundle size is a critical concern. The primary audience is developers working in resource-constrained environments or those who want a dependency-light solution for date manipulation.

Moment.js, despite its maturity and extensive feature set, is best suited for projects that require a comprehensive and battle-tested date library. It offers a vast array of functionalities for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates, catering to developers who need robust capabilities and are less concerned about its larger bundle size. Its long history means it has been used in countless large-scale applications.

A key architectural difference lies in their immutability. Day.js is inherently immutable, meaning that any operation performed on a Day.js object returns a new object, preserving the original. Moment.js, on the other hand, is mutable by default, where operations can modify the original Moment object, which can lead to unexpected side effects if not handled carefully.

Another significant technical difference is their approach to extensibility. Day.js uses a plugin system that allows developers to import only the functionality they need, keeping the core library small. This modular approach enables customization and avoids bloating the application with unused features. Moment.js has a more monolithic structure, with many features built into the core, though it also supports plugins and configurations for extending its capabilities.

From a developer experience perspective, Day.js offers a gentler learning curve, especially for those transitioning from Moment.js, due to its similar API. Its TypeScript support is generally considered excellent, providing strong typing out of the box. Moment.js, while also having good TypeScript support, can feel more verbose due to its mutable nature and extensive API surface, potentially requiring more attention to prevent unintended state changes.

Performance and bundle size are where Day.js truly shines. Its extremely small gzip bundle size (3.4 kB) is a major advantage for performance-critical applications, significantly reducing load times compared to Moment.js's 20.8 kB gzip bundle. This difference is substantial and can be a deciding factor for projects aiming for optimal user experience and faster initial page loads.

For new projects, especially front-end applications built with modern frameworks, Day.js is often the more pragmatic choice due to its size and immutability. If your primary need is date formatting, simple manipulation, and a small footprint, Day.js is recommended. Consider Moment.js if you are working on a legacy project already heavily invested in its ecosystem or if you require its specific, advanced features that may not be readily available or as mature in Day.js plugins.

Migration from Moment.js to Day.js is generally straightforward due to the similar API. However, migrating away from Moment.js in a large, established codebase requires careful consideration of mutability differences and potential side effects. Day.js aims to be a drop-in replacement where possible, but a thorough review of date manipulation logic is advised to ensure all mutable behaviors are accounted for.

Edge cases and niche use cases often highlight the depth of Moment.js. While Day.js covers most common date and time operations effectively, Moment.js has a longer history of handling complex internationalization scenarios, time zone intricacies, and legacy date formats. For applications requiring deep, specialized date handling beyond basic formatting and manipulation, Moment.js's maturity might still be preferred, though Day.js's plugin ecosystem is continually growing.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

RELATED COMPARISONS 8
dayjs vs luxon ★ 65.1K · 111.6M/wk @js-joda/core vs dayjs ★ 50.3K · 75.9M/wk @formkit/tempo vs dayjs ★ 51.3K · 71.4M/wk date-fns vs dayjs ★ 85.3K · 170.1M/wk date-fns vs moment ★ 84.6K · 133.8M/wk luxon vs moment ★ 64.4K · 75.2M/wk @js-joda/core vs moment ★ 49.6K · 39.5M/wk @formkit/tempo vs moment ★ 50.5K · 35.0M/wk