dayjs vs moment
Side-by-side comparison of dayjs and moment
- Weekly Downloads
- 33.6M
- Stars
- 48.6K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 1.2K
- Forks
- 2.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 680.1 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 24.0M
- Stars
- 48.0K
- Gzip Size
- 20.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 298
- Forks
- 7.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.4 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
dayjs vs moment Download Trends
dayjs vs moment: Verdict
Day.js is a modern, lightweight JavaScript library designed for date and time manipulation, offering an immutable API that closely mirrors Moment.js but with a significantly smaller footprint. Its primary audience includes web developers seeking a performant and compact solution for everyday date operations, especially in performance-sensitive applications or environments where bundle size is a critical concern. The library emphasizes ease of use, a familiar API for Moment.js users, and extensibility through a plugin system.
Moment.js, while historically dominant, is a comprehensive and feature-rich date library that provides extensive capabilities for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. It has long served as the de facto standard for date management in many JavaScript projects, catering to developers who require a robust and mature toolkit for complex date-related logic. Its extensive feature set and established ecosystem made it a go-to choice for many years.
A key architectural difference lies in their data handling and immutability. Day.js is by design immutable; all operations return a new instance of Day.js, preventing accidental modification of the original date object. This is a crucial aspect for predictable application state management. Moment.js, by contrast, is mutable by default, meaning many of its methods modify the original Moment object in place, which can lead to unexpected side effects if not handled carefully. Developers often need to explicitly create copies of Moment objects before performing destructive operations to maintain immiduty.
Regarding extensibility and plugin models, Day.js employs a modular approach where core functionality is kept minimal, and additional features like time zones, relative time, and calendar support are provided via optional plugins. This keeps the base library extremely small. Moment.js includes a vast array of functionalities within its core, and while it also has a plugin system, the base library is considerably larger due to its all-inclusive nature. This distinction affects how developers integrate specific features and manage their project's dependencies.
The developer experience with Day.js is often characterized by its shallow learning curve for those familiar with Moment.js due to its identical API. Its minimal nature and excellent TypeScript support contribute to a smooth development workflow, with fewer potential surprises due to its immutability. Debugging can be more straightforward as state modifications are explicit. Moment.js, while powerful, can present a steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and the need to manage mutability carefully. Debugging issues related to unexpected date mutations can be time-consuming.
Performance and bundle size are significant differentiators. Day.js boasts a mere 3.5 kB gzipped bundle size and is impressively small at 680.1 kB unpacked, emphasizing its lightweight design. This makes it an excellent choice for single-page applications, mobile web, and any scenario where minimizing the client-side JavaScript payload is paramount. Moment.js, at 20.4 kB gzipped and a substantial 4.4 MB unpacked size, is considerably larger, reflecting its comprehensive feature set but posing a challenge for performance-critical applications.
Practically, Day.js is recommended for new projects or when refactoring existing codebases where bundle size and performance are key considerations, especially if the project is a modern web application or a progressive web app. It's ideal for handling common date formatting, calculations, and comparisons efficiently. Moment.js might still be considered for legacy projects that already heavily rely on its extensive capabilities and where migration effort is a significant obstacle, or for highly specialized date manipulation tasks where its vast array of built-in features are indispensable and the trade-offs in size are acceptable.
Migration from Moment.js to Day.js is often straightforward for many common use cases due to the API compatibility, leading to a potentially low migration cost. Adopting Day.js can help decouple projects from the larger API surface and potential performance overhead of Moment.js. For ongoing maintenance, Day.js's smaller size and focus on core functionality suggest a potentially more stable and easily manageable long-term dependency, while Moment.js, despite its maturity, carries the inherent risks associated with larger, more complex libraries.
Edge cases and specific niche use cases are where the differences can become pronounced. While Day.js covers most common date needs effectively with its plugins, Moment.js's sheer breadth of historically developed features might provide solutions for very obscure or complex internationalization, time zone conversions across historical eras, or intricate calendar system manipulations that are not within Day.js's modular scope. However, for the vast majority of web development scenarios, Day.js’s plugin architecture is sufficiently flexible and performant.
dayjs vs moment: Feature Comparison
| Criteria | dayjs | moment |
|---|---|---|
| Core Philosophy | ✓ Lightweight, modular, and immutable date utility. | Comprehensive, feature-rich, and historically dominant date library. |
| Memory Footprint | ✓ Minimal unpacked size (680.1 kB), efficient memory usage. | Substantial unpacked size (4.4 MB), higher memory demand. |
| Primary Audience | ✓ Developers prioritizing performance, small bundle size, and modern practices. | Developers needing extensive date manipulation capabilities, often in legacy projects. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓ Excellent, designed with TypeScript in mind for modern development. | Good, but can be less seamless than libraries built with TS as a primary focus. |
| Extensibility Model | ✓ Modular plugin system for optional features, keeping core minimal. | Extensive built-in features with a large core, less reliant on plugins for common tasks. |
| API Design Consistency | ✓ Mirrors Moment.js API for easier adoption, focusing on immutability. | Mature and extensive API, but often mutable by default. |
| Bundle Size Efficiency | ✓ Extremely small (3.5 kB gzipped), highly optimized for performance. | Significantly larger (20.4 kB gzipped), due to comprehensive features. |
| Immutability by Default | ✓ Strictly immutable operations, returning new instances. | Mutable operations by default, requiring careful handling with copies. |
| Predictability of State | ✓ High due to inherent immutability, reducing side effects. | Moderate, requires developer discipline to manage mutable state. |
| Plugin Ecosystem Maturity | Growing and actively developed, covering essential extensions. | ✓ Vast and historically rich, with many niche plugins available. |
| Legacy Project Suitability | Can improve performance and reduce bundle size in legacy codebases. | ✓ The established standard for many older projects, lower immediate migration cost. |
| New Project Recommendation | ✓ Strongly recommended for new projects prioritizing performance and size. | Considered only if very specific, extensive Moment.js features are essential. |
| Migration Path from Moment.js | ✓ Generally straightforward due to API parity, low effort for common use cases. | N/A, as migration is typically *to* another library. |
| Learning Curve for Moment.js Users | ✓ Very shallow due to near-identical API. | N/A, as it's the reference for the familiar API. |