ioredis vs keyv
Side-by-side comparison of ioredis and keyv
- Weekly Downloads
- 12.5M
- Stars
- 15.2K
- Gzip Size
- 45.7 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 9d ago
- Open Issues
- 314
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 760.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 8
- Weekly Downloads
- 76.5M
- Stars
- 3.1K
- Gzip Size
- 3.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4h ago
- Open Issues
- 3
- Forks
- 193
- Unpacked Size
- 117.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
ioredis is designed as a powerful Redis client that excels in handling complex use cases, particularly with Redis Cluster and Sentinel. It is well-suited for projects needing robust Redis features and performance optimization, appealing to teams experienced with Node.js and Redis.
Conversely, keyv offers a simpler key-value storage solution with support for various backends, making it ideal for small to medium-sized projects or minimal setups. If your use case requires straightforward key-value storage that can work interchangeably with different databases, keyv is likely the better choice.
Migrating to ioredis can be more challenging due to its feature complexity, while keyv’s interface is easier to grasp for newcomers. Keep in mind that for applications requiring advanced Redis functionalities, ioredis is more appropriate, whereas keyv simplifies implementation for less demanding tasks.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | ioredis | keyv |
|---|---|---|
| Topics | Focused on Redis-related use cases. | ✓Broad spectrum of backends, including Redis. |
| Version | ✓5.9.2, more recent, likely with better updates. | 5.6.0, older version with fewer updates. |
| Categories | Specialized in Caching with Redis features. | General caching with multiple storage backends. |
| Description | A robust Redis client focused on performance. | A simple key-value storage solution. |
| Open Issues | 314 open issues may indicate potential areas of improvement. | ✓2 open issues suggest keyv might be more stable. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓1.2K forks suggest active development and experimentation. | 193 forks show limited community-driven development. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓15.2K stars reflect a strong, engaged community. | 3.1K stars indicate a smaller but dedicated user base. |
| Unpacked Size | 760.8 kB, reflecting its advanced features. | ✓117.3 kB, smaller and more lightweight. |
| Team Experience | Requires familiarity with Redis for optimal use. | ✓Easier for teams new to key-value storage. |
| Weekly Downloads | 12.4M downloads indicate strong usage for specialized needs. | ✓76.2M downloads show widespread adoption for general storage. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 45.7 kB, a reasonable size for its capabilities. | ✓3.8 kB, very minimal and efficient. |
| Use Case Suitability | Best for applications needing advanced Redis support. | ✓Ideal for simpler projects requiring key-value storage. |