keyv vs unstorage
Side-by-side comparison of keyv and unstorage
- Weekly Downloads
- 76.5M
- Stars
- 3.1K
- Gzip Size
- 3.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4h ago
- Open Issues
- 3
- Forks
- 193
- Unpacked Size
- 117.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.8M
- Stars
- 2.5K
- Gzip Size
- 3.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11h ago
- Open Issues
- 121
- Forks
- 178
- Unpacked Size
- 354.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
keyv is a simple and efficient key-value storage solution that excels in versatility with support for multiple backends. It targets developers looking for a lightweight, caching solution that can easily integrate with different database technologies.
In contrast, unstorage serves as a universal storage layer, catering to developers who may require a broader storage abstraction. If your project involves multiple complex data storage needs and you prefer a unified approach, unstorage may be the better choice, especially for larger teams and projects requiring extensive flexibility.
Considering migration and trade-offs, keyv is favored for projects seeking speed and simplicity, particularly where caching is prioritized. unstorage, with its larger bundle size and higher open issues, may necessitate more robust handling and consideration during integration.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | keyv | unstorage |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT licensing provides flexibility | MIT licensing offers similar flexibility |
| Version | Latest stable release is 5.6.0 | ✓Latest stable release is 1.17.4 |
| Categories | ✓Clearly categorized under caching | Also falls under caching, but broader topics are not defined |
| Description | ✓Simple key-value storage with multiple backend support | Universal storage layer catering to diverse needs |
| Open Issues | ✓Only 2 open issues, suggesting stability | Higher at 120 open issues, indicating potential challenges |
| GitHub Forks | ✓193 forks showing active development interest | 177 forks indicate solid but lesser engagement |
| GitHub Stars | ✓3.1K stars indicate strong community interest | Fewer at 2.5K stars, but still respectable |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 117.3 kB | Larger at 354.3 kB, which may impact loading times |
| Target Audience | Ideal for developers needing straightforward caching solutions | Better suited for those requiring versatile and varied storage capabilities |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Dominates the download statistics with 76.2M | Significantly lower at 3.7M |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Very small at 3.8 kB, minimizing loading overhead | Slightly larger at 3.9 kB, but comparably efficient |