lerna vs turbo
Side-by-side comparison of lerna and turbo
Download Trends
Verdict
Lerna is designed for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript and TypeScript packages within a single repository, making it ideal for larger teams looking to maintain a monorepo structure. It offers a comprehensive feature set that supports extensive package management workflows, catering to teams that require deep integration and control over their publishing processes.
Turbo, on the other hand, emphasizes high-performance builds specifically tailored for JavaScript and TypeScript codebases. It is well-suited for projects where fast incremental builds and optimized performance are critical, especially in more dynamic development environments where efficiency is paramount.
When deciding between the two, consider the scale of your project and team expertise. If your team needs robust publishing capabilities across numerous packages, Lerna may be the better choice. However, if performance is your primary concern, particularly in rapid development settings, Turbo would likely align more closely with your needs.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | lerna | turbo |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license offers flexibility in usage. | MIT license also provides similar freedom, no winner here. |
| Use Case | Best for larger, more complex monorepo projects that require robust management. | Ideal for teams looking for performance-optimized builds in JavaScript projects. |
| Open Issues | 396 open issues indicate several ongoing concerns that may impact user experience. | ✓137 open issues suggest fewer outstanding challenges to address. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓36.1K stars suggest strong community support and interest. | 29.8K stars reflect good support but less than lerna. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2026-02-07, indicating active maintenance. | Last updated on 2026-02-07, also shows active maintenance. |
| Unpacked Size | 8.5 MB, relatively larger; may impact initial load times. | ✓39.3 kB, significantly smaller, aiding in quicker installations and updates. |
| Learning Curve | May have a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive feature set. | ✓Generally easier to learn with a focus on build performance. |
| Weekly Downloads | 1.6 million weekly downloads indicates steady usage but less than turbo. | ✓8.8 million weekly downloads shows robust popularity and community engagement. |
| Community Activity | ✓Active community with a significant number of forks indicates user engagement. | Also engaged community, but slightly fewer forks than lerna. |
| Overall Positioning | Focused on managing and publishing multiple packages in a monorepo. | Designed for high-performance builds in JavaScript and TypeScript projects. |