nx vs turbo

Side-by-side comparison of nx and turbo

nx v22.4.5 MIT
Weekly Downloads
8.9M
Stars
28.1K
License
MIT
Last Updated
1d ago
Open Issues
564
Forks
2.7K
Unpacked Size
10.2 MB
turbo v2.8.3 MIT
Weekly Downloads
8.8M
Stars
29.8K
License
MIT
Last Updated
12m ago
Open Issues
139
Forks
2.2K
Unpacked Size
39.3 kB

Download Trends

Download trends for nx and turbo08.3M16.6M24.9M33.2MFeb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26
nx
turbo

Verdict

nx excels as a comprehensive solution for managing complex monorepos, making it ideal for teams needing extensive functionality in project orchestration and task management. With a robust feature set including project graph capabilities, nx is well-suited for larger teams or projects that require granular control and collaboration across multiple applications.

In contrast, turbo is tailored for high-performance builds in JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystems, appealing to teams that prioritize speed and simplicity in their development workflow. Its lightweight nature makes it an attractive option for smaller projects or teams with existing familiarity in build systems, wanting quick and efficient setups.

When considering migration or adoption, teams should evaluate their existing workflow and the complexity of their project. While nx may offer more features, the added size and overhead could be a concern for smaller teams or lighter projects, making turbo a compelling alternative for those focused on efficiency and straightforward configurations.

Detailed Comparison

Criteria nx turbo
Use Case Best for large-scale applications and complex monorepos Ideal for smaller projects needing fast builds
Bundle Size Larger at 10.2 MB, more extensive capabilities Minimal at 39.3 kB, lightweight and efficient
Ease of Use Steeper learning curve due to advanced features User-friendly and quick to set up
Open Issues Higher number of open issues may indicate complexity Fewer open issues suggest more stability
Performance Offers extensive task orchestration with potential overhead Designed for high-speed builds with minimal latency
Community Support Strong community with significant GitHub stars and forks Growing interest with slightly higher star count
Documentation Quality Comprehensive but may overwhelm new users Straightforward and easy to navigate
Overall Functionality Rich feature set for project management and orchestration Focuses on performance and simplicity in builds

Related Comparisons