@testing-library/react vs mocha
Side-by-side comparison of @testing-library/react and mocha
- Weekly Downloads
- 26.2M
- Stars
- 19.5K
- Gzip Size
- 101.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 20d ago
- Open Issues
- 74
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 336.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 13
- Weekly Downloads
- 12.1M
- Stars
- 22.9K
- Gzip Size
- 95.1 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 226
- Forks
- 3.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 19
Download Trends
Verdict
@testing-library/react offers comprehensive testing utilities specifically designed for React applications, promoting best practices in UI testing. It serves developers looking to create reliable user interface tests that focus on user behavior and accessibility.
Mocha, on the other hand, is a versatile and flexible test framework suitable for behavior-driven development (BDD) and test-driven development (TDD). It is a good fit for teams looking for a general-purpose testing solution across various JS environments, though it may require additional configuration for specific usage scenarios.
When deciding between these two packages, consider your project's scope and your team's familiarity. If your focus is on React applications, @testing-library/react is likely the better option. However, if you need a broader testing framework that can adapt to various use cases, consider Mocha for its flexibility.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @testing-library/react | mocha |
|---|---|---|
| License | Operates under the permissive MIT License, allowing widespread use. | Also uses the MIT License, ensuring similar accessibility. |
| Version | Versatile version 16.3.2 indicates recent updates and features. | Fixed version 11.7.5 is also relatively recent. |
| Description | Focuses on React DOM testing utilities emphasizing good practices. | Provides a simple and flexible test framework suitable for various styles. |
| Open Issues | ✓Maintains 74 open issues, reflecting a manageable backlog for developers. | Has a larger open issue count at 225, suggesting potential maintenance concerns. |
| Target User | Ideal for React developers aiming for robust component testing. | Best for general JavaScript testing scenarios across diverse applications. |
| GitHub Forks | 1.2K forks suggest a reasonable level of community experimentation. | ✓3.1K forks indicate greater interest for extension or modification. |
| GitHub Stars | Possesses 19.5K stars reflecting notable community interest. | ✓Offers 22.9K stars, indicating slightly higher appreciation. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 336.8 kB, making it lightweight for projects. | Larger at 2.3 MB, which may impact loading times. |
| Learning Curve | ✓User-friendly for React developers familiar with the ecosystem. | Slightly higher learning curve due to its flexibility and configurations. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Enjoys significantly higher weekly downloads at 26.4M. | Has a lower weekly download count at 12.0M, indicating lesser adoption. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Gzipped size of 101.4 kB is reasonable for deployment. | ✓Slightly smaller at 95.1 kB, advantageous for performance. |