@testing-library/react vs playwright
Side-by-side comparison of @testing-library/react and playwright
- Weekly Downloads
- 26.2M
- Stars
- 19.5K
- Gzip Size
- 101.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 20d ago
- Open Issues
- 74
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 336.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 13
- Weekly Downloads
- 34.4M
- Stars
- 82.3K
- Gzip Size
- 820.6 kB
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 596
- Forks
- 5.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 3.7 MB
- Dependencies
- 8
Download Trends
Verdict
@testing-library/react focuses on providing React-specific utilities for testing, catering primarily to React developers aiming for accessible and user-centric testing practices. In contrast, playwright excels at automation across multiple web browsers and is suitable for end-to-end testing, making it a versatile choice for teams looking for broader automation capabilities.
For projects that heavily use React and require thorough component testing, @testing-library/react is the appropriate choice. On the other hand, if an organization seeks to implement end-to-end testing across various browsers or is building a web application requiring cross-browser compatibility, playwright would be more beneficial.
Developers transitioning from simpler testing setups might find @testing-library/react easier to adopt due to its React-centric approach. playwright has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive features but offers wide-ranging automation beyond typical unit or component tests.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @testing-library/react | playwright |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license promotes wide usability | Apache-2.0 license also encourages usage with some restrictions |
| Version | Version 16.3.2 is stable and widely adopted | Version 1.58.2 is also well-maintained |
| Use Case | Effective for unit and integration testing in React applications | Primarily caters to end-to-end and functional testing across browsers |
| Description | Focused on React DOM testing for user-centric practices | Automation of web browsers with a high-level API |
| Open Issues | ✓74 open issues suggest manageable maintenance needs | 595 open issues may indicate a higher maintenance burden |
| GitHub Forks | 1.2K forks showing moderate community involvement | ✓5.1K forks reflecting strong community engagement |
| GitHub Stars | 19.5K stars demonstrate a robust user base | ✓82.3K stars indicate significantly more traction |
| Unpacked Size | ✓336.8 kB, relatively lightweight for its purpose | 3.7 MB indicates a heavier package |
| Learning Curve | ✓Lower, especially for those familiar with React | Higher due to extensive features and automation capabilities |
| Target Audience | Best suited for React developers prioritizing testing utilities | Ideal for teams needing comprehensive browser automation |
| Weekly Downloads | 26.4M, reflecting solid community support | ✓35.2M, indicating higher popularity and usage |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓101.4 kB, minimal footprint for testing tools | 820.6 kB is larger and less optimal for certain environments |