PACKAGE · BUNDLER

rollup

Next-generation ES module bundler

WEEKLY DOWNLOADS 122.8M
STARS 26.3K
FORKS 1.8K
OPEN ISSUES 610
GZIP SIZE 172.2 kB
UNPACKED SIZE 2.9 MB
DEPENDENCIES 2
LAST UPDATED 7mo ago
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

rollup downloads · last 12 months

Download trends for rollup1 download series from Oct 2025 to Sep 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.0139.8M279.6M419.5M559.3MOct 2025JanAprJulSep 2026
rollup
ABOUT ROLLUP

Rollup is a modern JavaScript module bundler designed to efficiently package JavaScript code for the web and Node.js. It addresses the challenge of managing dependencies and optimizing code output for diverse JavaScript environments by leveraging the ES module standard.

Its core philosophy centers on simplicity, performance, and extensibility, making it a popular choice for libraries and applications that require clean, optimized code. Rollup's primary audience includes library authors and developers building single-page applications or server-side components where efficient code splitting and tree-shaking are paramount.

The bundler's architecture relies on a plugin system that allows developers to hook into various stages of the bundling process. Key mechanisms include its ability to generate multiple output formats (like CJS, UMD, and ES modules) and its powerful tree-shaking capabilities, which eliminate unused code to reduce bundle size. The Rollup API enables programmatic configuration and integration into build pipelines.

Rollup integrates seamlessly with modern frontend frameworks and build tools. It serves as the foundational bundler for many tools, including Vite, and is commonly used in conjunction with tools like Babel for transpilation or PostCSS for CSS processing. Its configuration files are typically written in JavaScript or TypeScript, facilitating integration into existing development workflows.

With over 121.6 million weekly downloads and 26.3K GitHub stars, Rollup is a mature and widely-used bundler. Its focus on ES modules allows for highly effective tree-shaking, resulting in smaller bundle sizes compared to bundlers that rely solely on CommonJS. The unpacked size of 2.9 MB and gzipped bundle size of 172.2 kB indicate its own efficient packaging.

While Rollup excels in bundling libraries and optimizing for code-splitting, developers should be aware of its configuration complexity for certain advanced scenarios, particularly when dealing with legacy module formats or intricate asset handling. For simpler, rapid development workflows, alternative bundlers might offer quicker setup times, though potentially with less granular optimization.

WHEN TO USE
  • When building JavaScript libraries intended for distribution as ES modules, leveraging Rollup's excellent tree-shaking capabilities to minimize consumer bundle sizes.
  • For single-page applications where optimizing initial load times through efficient code-splitting and chunking is a critical requirement.
  • To generate multiple output formats (CommonJS, ES Module, UMD) from a single codebase for broad browser and Node.js compatibility.
  • When integrating with modern build pipelines that benefit from a plugin-based architecture for tasks like transpilation, minification, and asset management.
  • To bundle WebAssembly modules for use in JavaScript applications, taking advantage of Rollup's extensibility.
  • For progressive web applications (PWAs) requiring fine-grained control over asset bundling and code optimization.
  • When migrating from older module systems to ES modules and needing a robust bundler to manage the transition.
WHEN NOT TO USE
  • If your project only requires basic script concatenation and does not benefit from advanced code-splitting or tree-shaking, a simpler concatenation tool might suffice.
  • When developing small, self-contained scripts where the overhead of a full bundling process is unnecessary and could slow down development.
  • If your primary need is rapid, out-of-the-box development server experience with Hot Module Replacement (HMR) for frontend projects, other bundlers offer more integrated solutions.
  • For build processes that heavily rely on dynamic `require()` calls in CommonJS environments, Rollup's static analysis might require more complex configuration or plugins.
  • If you are working exclusively with a framework that dictates a specific, opinionated build setup, and that setup does not utilize Rollup, sticking to the framework's defaults is often simpler.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

COMPARISONS 5
rollup vs parcel ★ 44.0K · 320.1K/wk rollup vs vite ★ 83.1K · 185.7M/wk rollup vs esbuild ★ 40.1K · 289.6M/wk rollup vs @rspack/core ★ 12.9K · 8.5M/wk rollup vs webpack ★ 66.0K · 55.0M/wk