@rspack/core vs rollup
Side-by-side comparison of @rspack/core and rollup
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.3M
- Stars
- 12.5K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6h ago
- Open Issues
- 209
- Forks
- 759
- Unpacked Size
- 1.5 MB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 69.7M
- Stars
- 26.2K
- Gzip Size
- 167.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 598
- Forks
- 1.7K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.8 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
@rspack/core is a modern choice for developers looking for a fast, Rust-based web bundler that is compatible with the webpack API. It serves those seeking performance enhancements while maintaining a familiar interface for existing webpack users.
In contrast, rollup is designed as a next-generation ES module bundler that excels in scenarios requiring efficient tree-shaking and output generation for module-based applications. Developers with larger codebases or teams familiar with ES module concepts may find rollup more beneficial due to its extensive community support and adoption.
Considering project size and team experience can inform your decision. If your team is looking for a bundler that offers performance and is adaptable to existing webpack practices, @rspack/core may be the right choice. For those focused on modular architecture and extensive community resources, rollup stands out as a stronger candidate.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @rspack/core | rollup |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Version | 1.7.5 | ✓4.57.1 |
| Categories | Specifically categorized as a bundler with a broad scope. | Categorized as a bundler, focusing on ES modules. |
| Description | A fast Rust-based web bundler compatible with webpack API. | Next-generation ES module bundler. |
| Open Issues | ✓207 open issues, which may suggest active development but also potential concerns. | 598 open issues, indicating further room for improvement. |
| GitHub Forks | 758 forks, indicating a moderate level of community interest. | ✓1.7K forks, reflecting a more active community. |
| GitHub Stars | 12.5K, showing solid interest. | ✓26.2K, demonstrating a larger community backing. |
| Last Updated | February 7, 2026, indicating recent maintenance. | February 6, 2026, showing similar recency. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓1.5 MB, relatively lightweight. | 2.8 MB, slightly larger but depends on use case. |
| Weekly Downloads | 3.3M, indicating growing adoption. | ✓69.6M, a strong indicator of popularity. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | N/A provided. | ✓167.9 kB, efficient for production builds. |