@rspack/core vs parcel
Side-by-side comparison of @rspack/core and parcel
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.3M
- Stars
- 12.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6h ago
- Open Issues
- 209
- Forks
- 759
- Unpacked Size
- 1.5 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 278.6K
- Stars
- 44.0K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 585
- Forks
- 2.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 44.0 kB
Download Trends
Verdict
@rspack/core is designed for users seeking a high-performance bundler that leverages Rust for speed while maintaining a familiar webpack-like API, making it suitable for projects transitioning from webpack. In contrast, parcel offers a zero-configuration approach, ideal for developers who prioritize ease of use and fast setup without extensive configurations.
For projects that require complex builds with numerous assets or teams experienced in webpack ecosystems, @rspack/core may provide the necessary features and performance. On the other hand, parcel is more advantageous for smaller projects or teams with limited bundling experience, given its straightforward setup and less demanding configuration requirements.
It is essential to consider the learning curve and community support; with over 44K stars, parcel benefits from a larger community, potentially leading to more available resources and faster resolution of issues compared to @rspack/core's 12.5K stars. Additionally, the trade-off in size is notable, as @rspack/core is heavier at 1.5 MB compared to parcel's lightweight 44 KB, which might influence performance in smaller applications.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @rspack/core | parcel |
|---|---|---|
| Maturity | Recent updates show active development. | Also regularly updated, indicating sustained support. |
| Ease of Use | Requires familiarity with webpack-like configuration. | ✓Zero configuration needed, easy for beginners. |
| Open Issues | ✓207 open issues indicate moderate activity. | 586 open issues suggest more ongoing concerns. |
| Package Size | Significant at 1.5 MB, which may impact performance. | ✓Lightweight at 44 kB, beneficial for small projects. |
| Use Case Fit | Best for larger applications transitioning from webpack. | Ideal for smaller projects or rapid prototyping. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High usage with 3.3M weekly downloads. | Lower usage with 281.9K weekly downloads. |
| Community Support | Moderate community size with 12.5K stars on GitHub. | ✓Larger community with 44K stars providing more resources. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Strong TypeScript integration due to its robust API. | TypeScript support is generally good, but advanced usage may vary. |
| Overall Performance | ✓Optimized for speed using Rust, ideal for large-scale applications. | Fast with minimal configuration, suitable for rapid development. |
| Configuration Flexibility | ✓Highly configurable, offering many options for complex builds. | Limited to zero config, making it less flexible for intricate needs. |