@rspack/core vs vite
Side-by-side comparison of @rspack/core and vite
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.3M
- Stars
- 12.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6h ago
- Open Issues
- 209
- Forks
- 759
- Unpacked Size
- 1.5 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 55.3M
- Stars
- 78.0K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 19h ago
- Open Issues
- 627
- Forks
- 7.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@rspack/core is designed for projects that require a fast and efficient bundling solution with a webpack-compatible API, particularly appealing to teams familiar with JavaScript and Rust. Vite, on the other hand, caters to developers seeking a native-ESM build tool that emphasizes speed during development with its hot module replacement feature.
For smaller projects or when rapid iteration is required, Vite might be the better choice due to its higher download frequency and larger community support. In contrast, if a team's expertise aligns with Rust and they want a bundler that integrates well with existing webpack workflows, then @rspack/core is the appropriate option.
When considering migration, teams moving from webpack may find the transition to @rspack/core smoother because of its compatibility. Vite might require a steeper learning curve for teams not accustomed to native ESM workflows, but it offers significant performance benefits in development environments.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @rspack/core | vite |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Lightweight at 1.5 MB, suitable for compact builds | Slightly larger at 2.2 MB, but includes comprehensive features |
| Ease of Use | Familiar for webpack users but potentially complex for new users | ✓Straightforward setup, especially for new projects |
| Open Issues | ✓207 open issues may indicate room for improvement | 624 open issues reveal a need for ongoing support |
| Performance | Optimized for fast builds in a Rust environment | ✓Excellent performance with rapid module hot replacement |
| GitHub Forks | 758 forks suggest active development and experimentation | ✓7.8K forks signify a thriving ecosystem |
| GitHub Stars | 12.5K stars reflect a solid user base | ✓78.0K stars indicate strong community interest |
| Learning Curve | Moderate; requires understanding of Rust and existing webpack concepts | ✓Low; easier for modern JavaScript developers to grasp |
| Weekly Downloads | 3.3M downloads indicate niche adoption | ✓54.6M downloads show widespread use and popularity |
| Community Support | Smaller community, less extensive documentation | ✓Robust community with a wealth of resources and plugins |
| Development Speed | Fast bundling performance focused on Rust optimizations | ✓Emphasizes rapid development with native HMR capabilities |
| Use Case Suitability | Ideal for projects transitioning from webpack or requiring Rust performance | ✓Best for new projects prioritizing speed and simplicity |
| Integration Flexibility | Well-suited for existing webpack configurations | ✓Easily integrates with modern tooling and frameworks |