prisma vs sequelize
Side-by-side comparison of prisma and sequelize
- Weekly Downloads
- 8.1M
- Stars
- 45.3K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 2.5K
- Forks
- 2.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 37.8 MB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.4M
- Stars
- 30.3K
- Gzip Size
- 314.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 20h ago
- Open Issues
- 1.0K
- Forks
- 4.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.9 MB
- Dependencies
- 18
Download Trends
Verdict
Prisma is well-suited for modern application development, especially for teams looking to integrate a feature-rich database toolkit with an intuitive GUI. It serves both new and existing projects effectively, offering strong support for various databases and a straightforward API.
Sequelize is a solid choice for developers needing a lightweight, promise-based ORM that provides robust transaction and relation support. It's particularly advantageous for teams familiar with its legacy and structure, making it fitting for projects with established database strategies or those requiring support for multiple SQL dialects.
When considering migration or adaptation from Sequelize to Prisma, developers may find the transition complex due to Prisma's distinct model definitions and migration systems. Conversely, Prisma's comprehensive tooling and enhanced features might provide long-term benefits that justify the shift for teams targeting scalability and maintainability.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | prisma | sequelize |
|---|---|---|
| License | Apache-2.0 encourages flexibility in usage. | MIT is permissive and widely accepted. |
| Version | ✓7.3.0 is the latest stable version with ongoing updates. | 6.37.7 is stable but closer to its final versions. |
| Bundle Size | Not specified. | ✓314.9 kB is relatively lightweight. |
| Open Issues | 2.5K open issues may indicate a range of challenges or active development needs. | ✓1.0K issues suggest more manageable maintenance. |
| GitHub Forks | 2.0K forks suggest significant interest in extending Prisma. | ✓4.3K forks show a larger interest in modifying Sequelize. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓45.2K stars reflect high community endorsement. | 30.3K stars signify good but comparatively lower popularity. |
| Unpacked Size | 37.8 MB is sizable, hinting at a rich feature set. | ✓2.9 MB is minimal, ideal for lightweight applications. |
| Learning Curve | Prisma's modern approach may require an adjustment period for new users. | ✓Sequelize tends to have a more familiar structure for those used to traditional ORMs. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓8.0M indicates strong community adoption and support. | 2.4M shows a good user base but less traction than Prisma. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Prisma has strong compatibility with TypeScript out of the box. | Sequelize also supports TypeScript, but integration can be less seamless. |
| Transaction Support | Prisma provides built-in transaction management features. | ✓Sequelize excels with comprehensive transaction support including various features. |